Suppr超能文献

关节炎自我管理项目的差异:三项研究

Arthritis self-management program variations: three studies.

作者信息

Lorig K, González V M, Laurent D D, Morgan L, Laris B A

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Dec;11(6):448-54. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110604.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

  1. Determine strengths and weaknesses of the Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP). 2) Compare 3- and 6-week ASMP. 3) Evaluate 1.5-hour arthritis program.

METHODS

Study 1: Qualitative methods incorporating incomplete block design. Study 2: Comparison of 3- and 6-week outcomes. Study 3: Pretest/posttest comparison.

RESULTS

Study 1: Pain management, exercise, and sharing ranked as the most useful aspects of the ASMP. Nutrition, medications, and making decisions about nontraditional treatments ranked least useful. Study 2: Six-week ASMP subjects improved pain, health distress, illness impact, exercise, cognitive pain management, self-efficacy, and reduced visits to physicians (P < 0.05). Three-week subjects improved health distress, cognitive pain management, and self-efficacy (P < 0.05). Study 3: Improved knowledge, self-efficacy, and pain (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional 6-week ASMP is more effective than a 3-week version. A 1.5-hour community program is effective in increasing knowledge, self-efficacy, and contact with the Arthritis Foundation.

摘要

目标

1)确定关节炎自我管理项目(ASMP)的优势与不足。2)比较为期3周和6周的ASMP。3)评估为时1.5小时的关节炎项目。

方法

研究1:采用不完全区组设计的定性方法。研究2:比较3周和6周的结果。研究3:前测/后测比较。

结果

研究1:疼痛管理、运动和分享被列为ASMP最有用的方面。营养、药物治疗以及对非传统治疗方法的决策被列为最没用的方面。研究2:参加为期6周ASMP的受试者疼痛、健康困扰、疾病影响、运动、认知性疼痛管理、自我效能得到改善,就医次数减少(P<0.05)。参加为期3周ASMP的受试者健康困扰、认知性疼痛管理和自我效能得到改善(P<0.05)。研究3:知识、自我效能和疼痛得到改善(P<0.05)。

结论

传统的为期6周的ASMP比为期3周的更有效。一个为时1.5小时的社区项目在增加知识、自我效能以及与关节炎基金会的联系方面是有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验