School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e028626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028626.
To synthesise the evidence for the multifaceted self-management interventions for older women with urinary incontinence (UI) and to understand the outcomes associated with these interventions.
A systematic review and narrative synthesis to identify randomised controlled trials that investigated the effect of multifaceted self-management interventions for older women with UI.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts databases were searched (January 1990 to May 2019) using a systematic search strategy, complemented by manually screening the reference lists and citation indexes. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken independently. A narrative synthesis was undertaken in which studies, interventions and outcomes were examined based on the intervention components. The effect size and 95% CI were estimated from each study.
A total of 13 147 citations were identified and 16 studies were included. There was no study rated as of high quality. Three types of multifaceted interventions were found: those that had an element of pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME), those with bladder retraining and some with combination behavioural interventions. Outcome measures varied across studies. A statistically significant improvement in incontinence symptoms was reported in the intervention group compared with the control in 15 studies.
Multifaceted interventions that included PFME, bladder retraining or combination behavioural techniques appear to be useful in some settings for UI management in older women, but the quality of the evidence was poor and unclear. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether any of the combination of components is superior to others in improving UI symptoms. There is a need for high-quality studies to confirm the effectiveness of these interventions and to identify comparative effectiveness.
CRD42018104010.
综合多方面的自我管理干预措施在治疗老年女性尿失禁(UI)方面的证据,并了解这些干预措施相关的结果。
系统评价和叙述性综合,以确定调查多方面自我管理干预对老年女性 UI 影响的随机对照试验。
使用系统搜索策略搜索 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、CINAHL 和应用社会科学索引和摘要数据库(1990 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月),并通过手动筛选参考文献和引文索引进行补充。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估均由独立人员进行。根据干预组成部分,对研究、干预和结果进行了叙述性综合。从每项研究中估计了效应量和 95%置信区间。
共确定了 13147 条引文,纳入了 16 项研究。没有一项研究被评为高质量。发现了三种多方面的干预措施:一种是包含骨盆底肌肉运动(PFME)的,一种是膀胱训练的,还有一些是结合行为干预的。研究的结果测量指标各不相同。15 项研究报告干预组与对照组相比,尿失禁症状有显著改善。
在某些情况下,包括 PFME、膀胱训练或结合行为技术的多方面干预措施似乎对老年女性 UI 管理有用,但证据质量较差且不明确。没有足够的证据确定任何组合的组件在改善 UI 症状方面是否优于其他组件。需要高质量的研究来证实这些干预措施的有效性,并确定其相对有效性。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018104010。