Andersen O K, Svensson P, Ellrich J, Arendt-Nielsen L
Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;109(6):508-14. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00007-8.
During contraction of the jaw-closing muscles, afferent input from the intraoral and perioral region can elicit two bilateral suppression periods (SP1 and SP2, respectively) in the masseter electromyogram (EMG). Non-painful electrical stimulation 2 cm from the left labial commissure was used in the present study to evoke these trigeminal inhibitory reflexes. The subjects maintained a level of 50% of their maximum masseter EMG. The degree of suppression was quantified as the percentage suppression of the mean EMG activity in a fixed post-stimulus interval (SP2, 40-90 ms). Further, brief (200 ms) painful radiant heat conditioning stimuli were delivered to the ipsilateral cheek, in order to investigate the influence of nociceptive input on the (non-nociceptive) trigeminal masseter inhibitory reflex. Nine different conditions combining radiant heat and electrical stimuli were used. Twelve stimuli were presented for each condition. The radiant heat preceded the electrical test stimuli by fixed inter-stimulus intervals (ISI), ranging from 100 ms to 500 ms. At 250-350 ms ISIs, the bilateral SP2 suppression was significantly reduced to less than 10%, in comparison to an average suppression degree of 32.5% without conditioning stimuli. The subjects perceived the heat stimulus before the electrical stimulus for a majority of the 12 pairs of stimuli at these ISIs. No differences were found in the VAS ratings for the different conditions. For the contralateral SP1, larger suppression was seen for the 300 ms ISI compared with stimulation without conditioning heat stimuli. Onset and offset for the SP1 was, however, only detected in three subjects using a criteria of 20% suppression of the pre-stimulus activity. A pre-pulse inhibitory effect onto inter-neurons in the SP2 pathways or habituation of the same inter-neurons by the heat stimuli are suggested as possible explanations for the interaction between the non-nociceptive and nociceptive input in the present study.
在闭口肌收缩期间,来自口腔内和口周区域的传入输入可在咬肌肌电图(EMG)中引发两个双侧抑制期(分别为SP1和SP2)。本研究使用距左口角2 cm处的非疼痛性电刺激来诱发这些三叉神经抑制反射。受试者保持其最大咬肌EMG水平的50%。抑制程度被量化为在固定的刺激后间隔(SP2,40 - 90 ms)内平均EMG活动的抑制百分比。此外,为了研究伤害性输入对(非伤害性)三叉神经咬肌抑制反射的影响,向同侧脸颊施加短暂(200 ms)的疼痛性辐射热条件刺激。使用了九种将辐射热和电刺激相结合的不同条件。每种条件下呈现12次刺激。辐射热在电测试刺激之前以固定的刺激间隔(ISI)呈现,范围从100 ms到500 ms。在250 - 350 ms的ISI时,与无条件刺激时平均32.5%的抑制程度相比,双侧SP2抑制显著降低至小于10%。在这些ISI时,对于12对刺激中的大多数,受试者在电刺激之前感觉到热刺激。不同条件下的视觉模拟评分(VAS)未发现差异。对于对侧SP1,与无条件热刺激的刺激相比,300 ms的ISI出现了更大的抑制。然而,仅在三名受试者中使用刺激前活动抑制20%的标准检测到了SP1的起始和偏移。本研究中,非伤害性和伤害性输入之间的相互作用可能的解释是对SP2通路中中间神经元的预脉冲抑制作用或热刺激对相同中间神经元的习惯化。