ST-segment elevation during dobutamine stress testing predicts functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were (1) to assess the relation between ST-segment elevation and wall motion response occurring during dobutamine testing and (2) to evaluate the usefulness of stress-induced ST-segment elevation for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Clinical significance of stress-induced ST-segment elevation after acute myocardial infarction remains controversial. According to previous studies, it may reflect a larger infarcted area, depressed left ventricular function, left ventricular aneurysm, stress-induced dyskinesia, residual myocardial ischemia, or viability in the affected region. Whether transient ST-segment elevation occurring during dobutamine testing may predict functional recovery is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 38 patients who underwent dobutamine stress testing early (5 +/- 2 days) after a first acute myocardial infarction. Dobutamine was infused at increasing doses from 5 to a maximum of 40 microg/kg per minute, with the addition of up to 1 mg of atropine if the target rate could not be reached by dobutamine alone. Twelve-lead electrocardiography and cross-sectional echocardiography were continuously monitored throughout the test. Dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevation was defined as a new or worsening >/=1 mm elevation, 80 ms after J point, in >/=2 infarct-related leads. Quantitative angiography was available in all patients before hospital discharge. Follow-up resting echocardiography was recorded in all patients 12 to 18 months after the acute event. ST-segment elevation was observed in 20 of the 38 patients. There were no significant differences between patients with and those without dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevation in age, site of infarction, peak level of total creatine kinase enzyme, and use of thrombolytic therapy, angioplasty, or both. Persistent akinesis without change during dobutamine stress testing was more frequently observed in patients without ST elevation (P <. 05). A biphasic response during dobutamine testing was more frequently observed in patients with ST-segment elevation (P =.01). Multivariate analysis selected 2 independent variables associated with ST-segment elevation: a biphasic response during dobutamine stress (chi-square = 7.3; P =.007) and the minimal lumen diameter of the infarct-related vessel at quantitative angiography (chi-square = 5.5; P <.02). Functional recovery was demonstrated in 26 patients. Sensitivity of ST-segment elevation for the prediction of functional recovery was 69%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 90%, and accuracy 74%. Two independent variables predicting functional recovery were selected: dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevation (chi-square = 9.1; P =.003) and a biphasic response during stress (chi-square = 6.15; P =.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevation in the infarct-related leads is an ancillary sign of viable myocardium in jeopardy. It has a high specificity and an acceptable sensitivity for the prediction of functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.