Suppr超能文献

我们对用于检查上肢的体格检查测试的可靠性和有效性了解多少?

What do we know about the reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity?

作者信息

Marx R G, Bombardier C, Wright J G

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Jan;24(1):185-93. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.jhsu24a0185.

Abstract

The literature regarding the reliability and validity of commonly used clinical tests for disorders of the upper extremity was reviewed. Formal literature search, standard texts, and experts in the field of upper extremity were consulted to locate relevant articles. Range of motion and strength testing of the upper limb have been shown to be reliable, while various tests used for the diagnosis of conditions in the upper limb, such as carpal tunnel syndrome and rotator cuff tendinopathy, have been shown to have varying degrees of validity. Overall, however, we determined that there is little evidence regarding the reliability and validity of physical examination for the upper extremity and specifically less information available regarding the reliability of diagnostic physical examination tests and the validity of impairment measures used for the upper limb. Further studies in this area are warranted in view of the impact of these findings on the treatment of patients.

摘要

对有关上肢疾病常用临床检查的可靠性和有效性的文献进行了综述。通过正式的文献检索、标准文本以及咨询上肢领域的专家来查找相关文章。上肢的活动范围和力量测试已被证明是可靠的,而用于诊断上肢疾病(如腕管综合征和肩袖肌腱病)的各种检查已被证明具有不同程度的有效性。然而,总体而言,我们确定关于上肢体格检查的可靠性和有效性的证据很少,特别是关于诊断性体格检查测试的可靠性以及用于上肢的损伤测量的有效性的信息更少。鉴于这些发现对患者治疗的影响,该领域有必要进行进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验