Suppr超能文献

用于紧急输血的未交叉配血血液。在民用环境中的一年经验。

Un-cross-matched blood for emergency transfusion. One year's experience in a civilian setting.

作者信息

Blumberg N, Bove J R

出版信息

JAMA. 1978 Nov 3;240(19):2057-9.

PMID:100618
Abstract

One year's experience (56 cases) in the use of un-cross-matched blood for emergency transfusion in a large civilian teaching hospital showed that 49 transfusions were given as un-cross-matched, group-specific (ABO and Rh) blood in emergencies. Seventy-seven percent (43) of blood requests were for patients with trauma, unexpected massive intraoperative hemorrhage, or ruptured aneurysm. The indications for emergency transfusion were questionable in ten cases. There were no adverse effects noted even though complete serologic testing had not been done. While the use of un-cross-matched blood is usually safe, the potential for serious reaction exists. Overuse should be discouraged.

摘要

一家大型民用教学医院一年来(56例)在紧急输血中使用未交叉配血血液的经验表明,49次输血是在紧急情况下作为未交叉配血的、血型特异性(ABO和Rh)血液进行的。77%(43例)的输血请求是针对创伤、术中意外大出血或动脉瘤破裂患者。10例紧急输血的适应证存在疑问。尽管未进行完整的血清学检测,但未观察到不良反应。虽然使用未交叉配血血液通常是安全的,但仍存在严重反应的可能性。应避免过度使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验