Suppr超能文献

[憩室炎中的腹膜炎:伯尔尼概念]

[Peritonitis in diverticulitis: the Bern concept].

作者信息

Seiler C A, Brügger L, Maurer C A, Renzulli P, Büchler M W

机构信息

Klinik für Viszerale und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Bern, Inselspital.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(12):1394-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The colon is the most frequent origine for a diffuse peritonitis and diverticular perforation is again the most common source of a spontaneous secondary peritonitis. This paper first focuses on the treatment of peritonitis and secondly on the strategies of source control in peritonitis with special emphasis on the tactics (primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy) for surgical source control.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Prospective analysis of 404 patients suffering from peritonitis (11/93-2/98), treated with an uniform treatment concept including early operation, source control and extensive intraoperative lavage (20 to 30 liters) as a standard procedure. Other treatment measures were added in special indications "on demand" only. Peritonitis was graded with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Tactics of source control in peritonitis due to diverticulitis were performed according to "general condition" respectively the MPI of the patient.

RESULTS

The 404 patients averaged a MPI of 19 (0-35) in "local" peritonitis and a MPI of 26 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. The colon as a source of peritonitis resulted in MPI of 16 (0-33) in the case of "local" respectively 27 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. From 181 patients suffering from diverticulitis 144 needed an operation and in 78 (54%) peritonitis was present. Fourty-six percent (36) of the patients suffered from "local", 54% (42) from "diffuse" peritonitis. Resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 26% (20/78) whereas in 74% (58/78) of the patients a Hartmann procedure with colostomy was performed. The correlating MPI was 16 (0-28) vs. 23 (16-27) respectively. The analysis of complications and mortality based on the MPI showed a decent discrimination potential for primary anastomosis vs Hartmann procedure: morbidity 35% vs. 41%; reoperation 5% vs. 5%; mortality 0% vs. 14%.

CONCLUSION

In case of peritonitis due to diverticulitis the treatment of peritonitis comes first. Thanks to advances in intensive care and improved anti-inflammatory care, a more conservative surgical concept nowadays is accepted. In the case of diverticulitis the MPI is helpful to choose between primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy as source control. The MPI includes the "general condition" of the patient into the tactical decision how to attain source control.

摘要

引言

结肠是弥漫性腹膜炎最常见的起源部位,而憩室穿孔再次成为自发性继发性腹膜炎最常见的病因。本文首先聚焦于腹膜炎的治疗,其次关注腹膜炎的源头控制策略,特别强调手术源头控制的策略(一期吻合术与带结肠造口术的哈特曼手术)。

患者与方法

对404例腹膜炎患者(1993年11月至1998年2月)进行前瞻性分析,采用统一的治疗理念,包括早期手术、源头控制以及作为标准操作的广泛术中灌洗(20至30升)。仅在特殊指征下“按需”增加其他治疗措施。采用曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)对腹膜炎进行分级。因憩室炎导致的腹膜炎的源头控制策略根据患者的“一般状况”或MPI分别实施。

结果

404例患者“局部”腹膜炎的MPI平均为19(0至35),“弥漫性”腹膜炎的MPI平均为26(11至43)。作为腹膜炎源头的结肠,在“局部”腹膜炎时MPI为16(0至33),在“弥漫性”腹膜炎时为27(11至43)。181例憩室炎患者中,144例需要手术,其中78例(54%)存在腹膜炎。46%(36例)患者为“局部”腹膜炎,54%(42例)为“弥漫性”腹膜炎。26%(20/78)的患者进行了一期吻合术切除,而74%(58/78)的患者进行了带结肠造口术的哈特曼手术。相关的MPI分别为16(0至28)和23(16至27)。基于MPI对并发症和死亡率的分析显示,一期吻合术与哈特曼手术之间有较好的区分潜力:发病率35%对41%;再次手术率5%对5%;死亡率0%对14%。

结论

对于因憩室炎导致的腹膜炎,首先要治疗腹膜炎。由于重症监护的进展和抗炎治疗的改善,如今更保守的手术理念已被接受。对于憩室炎,MPI有助于在一期吻合术与带结肠造口术的哈特曼手术之间选择作为源头控制的方法。MPI将患者的“一般状况”纳入如何实现源头控制的策略决策中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验