• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在增强患者对其医生信任度的干预措施。斯坦福信任研究医生小组。

An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. Stanford Trust Study Physician Group.

作者信息

Thom D H, Bloch D A, Segal E S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304-1760, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1999 Feb;74(2):195-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199902000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-199902000-00019
PMID:10065061
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of a one-day workshop in which physicians were taught trust-building behaviors on their patients' levels of trust and on outcomes of care.

METHOD

In 1994, the study recruited 20 community-based family physicians and enrolled 412 consecutive adult patients from those physicians' practices. Ten of the physicians (the intervention group) were randomly assigned to receive a one-day training course in building and maintaining patients' trust. Outcomes were patients' trust in their physicians, patients' and physicians' satisfaction with the office visit, continuity in the patient-physician relationship, patients' adherence to their treatment plans, and the numbers of diagnostic tests and referrals.

RESULTS

Physicians and patients in the intervention and control groups were similar in demographic and other data. There was no significant difference in any outcome. Although their overall ratings were not statistically significantly different, the patients of physicians in the intervention group reported more positive physician behaviors than did the patients of physicians in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The trust-building workshop had no measurable effect on patients' trust or on outcomes hypothesized to be related to trust.

摘要

目的

探讨为期一天的培训工作坊对医生建立信任行为的教导,对患者信任水平及护理结果的影响。

方法

1994年,该研究招募了20名社区家庭医生,并从这些医生的诊疗中纳入了412名连续的成年患者。其中10名医生(干预组)被随机分配接受为期一天的关于建立和维持患者信任的培训课程。结果指标包括患者对医生的信任、患者和医生对门诊的满意度、医患关系的连续性、患者对治疗计划的依从性以及诊断检查和转诊的数量。

结果

干预组和对照组的医生及患者在人口统计学和其他数据方面相似。在任何结果指标上均无显著差异。尽管总体评分无统计学显著差异,但干预组医生的患者报告的医生积极行为比对照组医生的患者更多。

结论

建立信任的工作坊对患者的信任或假设与信任相关的结果没有可测量的影响。

相似文献

1
An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. Stanford Trust Study Physician Group.一项旨在增强患者对其医生信任度的干预措施。斯坦福信任研究医生小组。
Acad Med. 1999 Feb;74(2):195-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199902000-00019.
2
Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.医生信任量表的进一步验证与信度测试。斯坦福信任研究医生团队。
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):510-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010.
3
Training physicians to increase patient trust.培训医生以增强患者信任。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2000 Aug;6(3):245-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00249.x.
4
Influences on patients' ratings of physicians: Physicians demographics and personality.对患者对医生评分的影响:医生的人口统计学特征和个性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
5
The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust.医生薪酬支付方式与患者信任之间的关系。
JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1708-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1708.
6
Patients' trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method.患者对医生的信任:选择、连续性和支付方式的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Oct;13(10):681-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00204.x.
7
Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists.解决把关人难题:患者在初级保健及转诊至专科医生方面看重的因素。
JAMA. 1999 Jul 21;282(3):261-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.3.261.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust.在对医生风格的认知和信任方面的种族及民族差异。
Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1156-63. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1156.
9
The impact of facecards on patients' knowledge, satisfaction, trust, and agreement with hospital physicians: a pilot study.花脸牌对患者关于医院医生的知识、满意度、信任及认同的影响:一项试点研究
J Hosp Med. 2014 Mar;9(3):137-41. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2100. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Finding the right interactional temperature: do colder patients need more warmth in physician communication style?寻找合适的互动温度:更冷漠的患者是否需要医生在沟通方式上更热情?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.034. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A root cause analysis of community-acquired pressure injuries in persons with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤患者社区获得性压疮的根本原因分析
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2025 Apr 22;11(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41394-025-00707-z.
2
A model of contributors to a trusting patient-physician relationship: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.促成信任的医患关系的因素模型:基于系统检索策略的批判性评价
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 1;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02435-z.
3
Impact of value similarity on social trust in medical students: a cross-sectional web survey.
价值相似性对医学生社会信任的影响:一项横断面网络调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04493-w.
4
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.继续教育会议和研讨会:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD003030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub3.
5
Participatory decision-making for cancer care in a high-risk sample of low income Mexican-American breast cancer survivors: The role of acculturation.低收入墨西哥裔美国乳腺癌幸存者高危样本中癌症护理的参与式决策:文化适应的作用。
Int J Healthc. 2020;6(2):35-43. doi: 10.5430/ijh.v6n2p35. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Can Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review.医患人际干预能否实现医疗保健的四重目标?系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2107-2117. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05525-2. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
The Relationship of Patient-Provider Communication on Quality of Life among African-American and White Cancer Survivors.非裔美国人和白人癌症幸存者中患者与医疗服务提供者沟通对生活质量的影响
J Health Commun. 2017 Jul;22(7):584-592. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1324540. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
8
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients' views of interventions to reduce treatment loss to follow-up.耐多药结核病患者对减少治疗失访干预措施的看法。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Jan 1;21(1):23-31. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0433.
9
A qualitative analysis of interprofessional healthcare team members' perceptions of patient barriers to healthcare engagement.对跨专业医疗团队成员对患者参与医疗保健的障碍认知的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1751-5.
10
Construction and validation of a preliminary Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale.维克森林医师信任量表中文版初稿的构建与验证
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 5;20:1142-50. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889992.