Blackley H R, Plank L D, Robertson P A
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Jan;81(1):110-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.9001.
The ratio of the sagittal diameter of the cervical canal to the corresponding diameter of the vertebral body has been described as a reliable means for assessing stenosis of the canal and detecting those at risk of cervical neuropraxia. The use of ratio techniques has the advantage of avoiding variation in magnification when direct measurements are made from plain radiographs. We examined the reliability of this method using plain lateral radiographs of unknown magnification and CT scans. We also assessed other possible ratios of anatomical measurements as a guide to the diameter of the canal. Our findings showed a poor correlation between the true diameter of the canal and the ratio of its sagittal diameter to that of the vertebral body. No other more reliable ratio was identified. The variability in anatomical morphology means that the use of ratios from anatomical measurements within the cervical spine is not reliable in determining the true diameter of the cervical canal.
颈椎管矢状径与相应椎体直径的比值已被描述为评估椎管狭窄和检测有颈椎神经失用风险者的可靠方法。当从平片进行直接测量时,使用比值技术具有避免放大倍数变化的优点。我们使用放大倍数未知的平片侧位片和CT扫描检查了该方法的可靠性。我们还评估了解剖测量的其他可能比值,作为椎管直径的参考。我们的研究结果表明,椎管的真实直径与其矢状径与椎体直径的比值之间相关性较差。未发现其他更可靠的比值。解剖形态的变异性意味着,在确定颈椎管的真实直径时,使用颈椎内解剖测量的比值并不可靠。