da Rosa L A, Regulla D F, Fill U A
Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, IEN, CNEN/RJ, Brazil.
Appl Radiat Isot. 1999 Mar;50(3):573-7. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00068-2.
The precision of the thermoluminescent response of Harshaw micro-cube dosimeters (TLD-100), evaluated in both Harshaw thermoluminescent readers 5500 and 3500, for 1 Gy dose value, was investigated. The mean reproducibility for micro-cubes, pre-readout annealed at 100 degrees C for 15 min, evaluated with the manual planchet reader 3500, is 0.61% (1 standard deviation). When micro-cubes are evaluated with the automated hot-gas reader 5500, reproducibility values are undoubtedly worse, mean reproducibility for numerically stabilised dosimeters being equal to 3.27% (1 standard deviation). These results indicate that the reader model 5500, or, at least, the instrument used for the present measurements, is not adequate for micro-cube evaluation, if precise and accurate dosimetry is required. The difference in precision is apparently due to geometry inconsistencies in the orientation of the imperfect micro-cube faces during readout, requiring careful and manual reproducible arrangement of the selected micro-cube faces in contact with the manual reader planchet.
研究了在哈肖5500型和3500型热释光读数器中评估的哈肖微立方剂量计(TLD - 100)对1 Gy剂量值的热释光响应精度。对于在100摄氏度下预读出退火15分钟的微立方,使用手动托盘读数器3500评估的平均再现性为0.61%(1个标准差)。当使用自动热气体读数器5500评估微立方时,再现性值无疑更差,数值稳定剂量计的平均再现性等于3.27%(1个标准差)。这些结果表明,如果需要精确准确的剂量测定,5500型读数器,或者至少是用于当前测量的仪器,不适合用于微立方评估。精度差异显然是由于在读数过程中不完美微立方面的取向存在几何不一致,这需要仔细且手动可重复地安排所选微立方面与手动读数器托盘接触。