Weintraub W S, Culler S D, Kosinski A, Becker E R, Mahoney E, Burnette J, Spertus J A, Feeny D, Cohen D J, Krumholz H, Ellis S G, Demopoulos L, Robertson D, Boccuzzi S J, Barr E, Cannon C P
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Feb 1;83(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00860-1.
Concern over escalating health care costs has led to increasing focus on economics and assessment of outcome measures for expensive forms of therapy. This is being investigated in the Treat Angina With Aggrastat [tirofiban] and Determine Cost of Therapy with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 trial, a randomized trial comparing outcome of patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction treated with tirofiban and then randomized to an invasive versus a conservative strategy. Hospital and professional costs initially and over 6 months, including outpatient costs, will be assessed. Hospital costs will be determined for patients in the United States from the UB92 formulation of the hospital bill, with costs derived from charges using departmental cost to charge ratios. Professional costs will be determined by accounting for professional services and then converted to resource units using the Resource Based Relative Value Scale and then to costs using the Medicare conversion factor. Follow-up resource consumption, including medications, testing and office visits, will be carefully measured with a Patient Economic Form, and converted to costs from the Medicare fee schedule. Health-related quality of life will be assessed with a specific instrument, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and a general instrument, the Health Utilities Index at baseline, 1, and 6 months. The Health Utilities Index will also be used to construct a utility. By knowing utility and survival, quality-adjusted life years will be determined. These measures will permit the performance of a cost-effectiveness analysis, with the cost-effectiveness of the invasive strategy defined and the difference in cost between the invasive and conservative strategies divided by the difference in quality-adjusted life years. The economic and health-related quality of life aspects of TACTICS-TIMI 18 are an integral part of the study design and will provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of invasive versus conservative management strategies on a broad range of outcomes after hospitalization for unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.
对医疗费用不断攀升的担忧,已促使人们越来越关注经济学以及对昂贵治疗形式的疗效评估指标。依替巴肽治疗心绞痛并确定侵入性或保守性治疗策略的治疗成本(TACTICS)-心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)18试验正在对此进行研究,这是一项随机试验,比较了接受替罗非班治疗后再随机分为侵入性策略组和保守性策略组的不稳定型心绞痛或非Q波心肌梗死患者的疗效。将评估初始及6个月内的医院和专业成本,包括门诊成本。美国患者的医院成本将根据医院账单的UB92格式确定,成本由使用科室成本收费比的收费得出。专业成本将通过核算专业服务来确定,然后使用基于资源的相对价值量表转换为资源单位,再使用医疗保险转换因子转换为成本。随访资源消耗,包括药物、检查和门诊就诊,将使用患者经济表格仔细测量,并根据医疗保险费用表转换为成本。将使用特定工具西雅图心绞痛问卷和通用工具健康效用指数在基线、1个月和6个月时评估健康相关生活质量。健康效用指数也将用于构建一个效用值。通过了解效用值和生存率,将确定质量调整生命年。这些措施将允许进行成本效益分析,确定侵入性策略的成本效益,并将侵入性和保守性策略之间的成本差异除以质量调整生命年的差异。TACTICS-TIMI 18试验的经济和健康相关生活质量方面是研究设计的一个组成部分,将全面了解侵入性与保守性管理策略对不稳定型心绞痛或非Q波心肌梗死后广泛结局的影响。