Mahoney Elizabeth M, Jurkovitz Claudine T, Chu Haitao, Becker Edmund R, Culler Steven, Kosinski Andrzej S, Robertson Debbie H, Alexander Charles, Nag Soma, Cook John R, Demopoulos Laura A, DiBattiste Peter M, Cannon Christopher P, Weintraub William S
Emory Center for Outcomes Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1256 Briarcliff Rd, Suite 1N, Atlanta, GA 30306, USA.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1851-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1851.
In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 18 trial, patients with either unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) treated with the platelet glycoprotein (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitor tirofiban had a significantly reduced rate of major cardiac events at 6 months with an early invasive vs a conservative strategy.
To examine total 6-month costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of an invasive vs a conservative strategy.
Randomized controlled trial including a priori economic end points.
Hospitalization for UA/NSTEMI with 6-month follow-up period.
A total of 2220 patients with UA/NSTEMI; economic data from 1722 patients at US-non-VA hospitals.
Early invasive strategy with routine catheterization and revascularization as appropriate vs a conservative strategy with catheterization performed only for recurrent ischemia or a positive stress test.
Total 6-month costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
The average initial hospitalization costs among those in the invasive strategy group were $15714 vs $14047 among those in the conservative strategy group, a difference of $1667 (95% confidence interval [CI], $387-3091). The in-hospital costs were offset significantly at the 6-month follow-up, with an average cost in the invasive group of $6098 vs $7180 in the conservative group, a difference of $1082 (95% CI, -$2051 to $76). The average total costs at 6 months, including productivity costs, for the invasive group was $21 813 vs $21 227 for the conservative group, a $586 difference (95% CI, -$1087 to $2486). The average 6-month costs excluding productivity costs in the invasive group was $19 780 vs $19 111 in the conservative group, a difference of $670, 95% CI; (-$1035 to $2321). Estimated cost per year of life gained for the invasive strategy, based on projected life expectancy, was $12739 for the base case, and ranged from $8371 to $25769, based on model assumptions.
In patients with UA/NSTEMI treated with the Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the clinical benefit of an early invasive strategy was achieved with a small increase in cost, yielding favorable projected estimates of cost per year of life gained. These results support the broader use of an early invasive strategy in these patients.
在应用阿昔单抗治疗心绞痛及确定侵入性或保守性治疗策略的成本(TACTICS)-心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)18试验中,对于不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(UA/NSTEMI)患者,应用血小板糖蛋白(Gp IIb/IIIa)抑制剂替罗非班治疗时,与保守性策略相比,早期侵入性策略使6个月时主要心脏事件发生率显著降低。
研究侵入性策略与保守性策略的6个月总成本及长期成本效益。
包括先验经济终点的随机对照试验。
UA/NSTEMI住院患者,随访6个月。
共2220例UA/NSTEMI患者;来自美国非退伍军人医院1722例患者的经济数据。
早期侵入性策略,即适时进行常规导管插入术和血运重建,对比保守性策略,即仅在复发缺血或负荷试验阳性时进行导管插入术。
6个月总成本及增量成本效益比。
侵入性策略组患者的平均初始住院费用为15714美元,保守性策略组为14047美元,相差1667美元(95%置信区间[CI],387 - 3091美元)。在6个月随访时,住院费用显著抵消,侵入性组平均费用为6098美元,保守性组为7180美元,相差1082美元(95% CI,-2051至76美元)。侵入性组6个月的平均总成本,包括生产力成本,为21813美元,保守性组为21227美元,相差586美元(95% CI,-1087至2486美元)。侵入性组排除生产力成本后的6个月平均费用为19780美元,保守性组为19111美元,相差670美元,95% CI为(-1035至2321美元)。基于预期寿命,侵入性策略每获得一年生命的估计成本,基础病例为12739美元,根据模型假设范围为8371至25769美元。
在应用Gp IIb/IIIa抑制剂替罗非班治疗的UA/NSTEMI患者中,早期侵入性策略虽成本略有增加,但获得了临床益处,每获得一年生命的预计成本估计有利。这些结果支持在这些患者中更广泛地应用早期侵入性策略。