Suppr超能文献

体外循环期间的溶血:标准滚压泵、非阻塞性滚压泵和离心泵的体内比较

Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: an in vivo comparison of standard roller pumps, nonocclusive roller pumps and centrifugal pumps.

作者信息

Hansbro S D, Sharpe D A, Catchpole R, Welsh K R, Munsch C M, McGoldrick J P, Kay P H

机构信息

Yorkshire Heart Centre, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Perfusion. 1999 Jan;14(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/026765919901400102.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) involves the use of either an occlusive roller pump or centrifugal pump. Damage to blood elements, including haemolysis, may arise from occlusion when using a roller pump; the appropriate degree of occlusion has not yet been determined scientifically. Centrifugal and nonocclusive roller pumps are reputed to reduce haemolysis. The objective of this study was to compare haemolysis caused by a standard roller pump with a dynamically set nonocclusive roller pump and with a centrifugal pump. We prospectively randomized 60 patients undergoing routine coronary artery surgery into three groups: standard roller pump (STD, n = 20), dynamically set roller pump (DYN, n = 20), or centrifugal pump (CEN, n = 20). The level of plasma free haemoglobin (FHb) was measured preoperatively, and the rate of formation of FHb (in mg/dl/min) was determined at the end of the ischaemic phase and at the end of CPB. Cardiotomy suction blood was isolated for the ischaemic phase and returned before the end of CPB. It was found that there were no differences between the groups in demographic or operative variables. The rate of formation of FHb at the end of the ischaemic phase was similar for all groups (STD 0.108 +/- 0.10, DYN 0.117 +/- 0.08, CEN 0.129 +/- 0.07). At the end of CPB, after return of the cardiotomy suction blood, there was a significant (< 0.001) increase in the rate of formation of FHb in all groups. The increase was similar for each of the groups (STD 0.424 +/- 0.17, DYN 0.481 +/- 0.20, CEN 0.471 +/- 0.18). We conclude that the rates of haemolysis are similar for each of the pump types, and no benefit is conferred by the use of either a dynamically set roller pump or a centrifugal pump compared with the standard roller pump. The return of the cardiotomy suction blood to the circulation is the principal source of plasma free haemoglobin.

摘要

体外循环(CPB)涉及使用闭塞式滚压泵或离心泵。使用滚压泵时,包括溶血在内的血液成分损伤可能源于闭塞;科学上尚未确定合适的闭塞程度。离心式和非闭塞式滚压泵据称可减少溶血。本研究的目的是比较标准滚压泵、动态设置的非闭塞式滚压泵和离心泵引起的溶血情况。我们将60例行常规冠状动脉手术的患者前瞻性随机分为三组:标准滚压泵组(STD,n = 20)、动态设置滚压泵组(DYN,n = 20)或离心泵组(CEN,n = 20)。术前测量血浆游离血红蛋白(FHb)水平,并在缺血期末和体外循环结束时测定FHb的生成速率(mg/dl/min)。将心脏切开吸引血分离用于缺血期,并在体外循环结束前回输。结果发现,各组在人口统计学或手术变量方面无差异。缺血期末所有组的FHb生成速率相似(STD 0.108±0.10,DYN 0.117±0.08,CEN 0.129±0.07)。体外循环结束时,在回输心脏切开吸引血后,所有组的FHb生成速率均显著(<0.001)增加。各组增加情况相似(STD 0.424±0.17,DYN 0.481±0.20,CEN 0.471±0.18)。我们得出结论,每种泵类型的溶血速率相似,与标准滚压泵相比,使用动态设置的滚压泵或离心泵均无益处。心脏切开吸引血回输到循环中是血浆游离血红蛋白的主要来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验