Suppr超能文献

将哮喘患者从使用氯氟烃(CFC)沙丁胺醇转换为使用氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA)沙丁胺醇。

Switching patients with asthma from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) albuterol to hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol.

作者信息

Bronsky E, Ekholm B P, Klinger N M, Colice G L

机构信息

Intermountain Clinical Research Unit, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Asthma. 1999;36(1):107-14. doi: 10.3109/02770909909065154.

Abstract

Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants deplete stratospheric ozone. Production and use of CFCs, except for certain critical exemptions, has been prohibited by the Montreal Protocol. Use of CFCs as propellants in metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) is still allowed, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is planning the transition to alternative propellants for use in MDIs. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA), a non-ozone-depleting propellant, has been used to reformulate albuterol (HFA albuterol). This study evaluates whether comparable safety and efficacy continues for 12 weeks after patients with asthma are switched from CFC albuterol to HFA albuterol. Patients with asthma stabilized on CFC albuterol during a 12-week safety and efficacy trial were randomized to either continue receiving CFC albuterol or to be switched to receive HFA albuterol in a yearlong safety and efficacy trial. Safety and efficacy were compared over the first 12 weeks of the yearlong trial between patients who had remained on CFC albuterol and those who had been switched to HFA albuterol. Bronchodilator efficacy was evaluated by serial spirometry for 6 hr after the patients self-administered the study drug in the clinic. Safety was assessed by measuring changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals after dosing with study drug, monitoring adverse events, and performing prestudy and poststudy laboratory testing and physical examinations. No significant differences in bronchodilator efficacy between the patients continuing to receive CFC albuterol and those switched to HFA albuterol were found in the 12 weeks after the switch. No differences between the two products were found for changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, and ECG intervals. Adverse event profiles were similar for the two products, except the patients remaining on CFC albuterol reported increased asthma symptoms and rhinitis significantly more often than the patients switched to HFA albuterol. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory tests or physical examinations were found in either treatment group. Patients with asthma switched from CFC albuterol to HFA albuterol receive comparable bronchodilation with a similar safety profile as those continuing to receive CFC albuterol.

摘要

氯氟烃(CFC)推进剂会消耗平流层中的臭氧。除某些关键豁免情况外,《蒙特利尔议定书》已禁止生产和使用氯氟烃。在定量吸入器(MDI)中使用氯氟烃作为推进剂仍被允许,但美国食品药品监督管理局正计划向用于MDI的替代推进剂过渡。氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA)是一种不消耗臭氧的推进剂,已被用于重新配制沙丁胺醇(HFA沙丁胺醇)。本研究评估哮喘患者从CFC沙丁胺醇转换为HFA沙丁胺醇后12周内,其安全性和有效性是否持续相当。在一项为期12周的安全性和有效性试验中使用CFC沙丁胺醇病情稳定的哮喘患者,在一项为期一年的安全性和有效性试验中被随机分组,分别继续接受CFC沙丁胺醇或转换为接受HFA沙丁胺醇。在为期一年试验的前12周内,比较继续使用CFC沙丁胺醇的患者和已转换为HFA沙丁胺醇的患者的安全性和有效性。患者在诊所自行使用研究药物后,通过连续6小时的肺功能测定评估支气管扩张剂的疗效。通过测量服用研究药物后脉搏率、血压和心电图(ECG)间期的变化、监测不良事件以及进行研究前和研究后的实验室检测及体格检查来评估安全性。转换后12周内,继续接受CFC沙丁胺醇的患者和转换为HFA沙丁胺醇的患者在支气管扩张剂疗效方面未发现显著差异。两种产品在脉搏率、血压和ECG间期变化方面未发现差异。两种产品的不良事件谱相似,但继续使用CFC沙丁胺醇的患者报告哮喘症状和鼻炎加重的频率明显高于转换为HFA沙丁胺醇的患者。两个治疗组在实验室检测或体格检查中均未发现具有临床意义的变化。从CFC沙丁胺醇转换为HFA沙丁胺醇的哮喘患者与继续接受CFC沙丁胺醇的患者相比,支气管扩张效果相当,安全性相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验