• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从喘乐宁(含氯氟烃)转换为喘乐宁(氢氟烷烃)对哮喘患者耐受性良好且有效。

Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and effective in patients with asthma.

作者信息

Lumry W, Noveck R, Weinstein S, Barnhart F, Vandermeer A, Murray A, Reisner C

机构信息

AARA Research Center, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Mar;86(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63302-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63302-9
PMID:11289328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Environmental imperatives to eliminate the use of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in metered-dose inhalers have led to the development of metered-dose inhalers with the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA-134a) propellants.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effect of switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA and to compare the efficacy and safety of Ventolin CFC, Ventolin HFA, and placebo in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized safety and efficacy trial comparing regular use of Ventolin CFC versus Ventolin HFA versus placebo for 12 weeks in 313 patients with asthma aged 12 years and older who received Ventolin CFC during a 3-week run-in period.

RESULTS

Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained pulmonary function and other measures of asthma control at levels comparable with run-in baseline. Serial pulmonary function testing demonstrated that both Ventolin treatments had significantly greater mean improvement in FEV1 over baseline than the placebo group at treatment day 1 and weeks 6 and 12 (P < .001). Both Ventolin groups had comparable pulmonary function at every visit. Predose FEV1 values were maintained or improved over time with all treatments. Treatments were well-tolerated. The adverse event profile for both Ventolin treatments was comparable with placebo. No clinically relevant effects on ECG, vital signs, or clinical laboratory tests were noted. Asthma exacerbation rates were 4% to 5% in the Ventolin groups and slightly higher (8%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained comparable asthma control with a similar safety profile.

摘要

背景

消除定量吸入器中氯氟烃(CFC)推进剂使用的环境要求促使了含氢氟烷烃(HFA-134a)推进剂的定量吸入器的研发。

目的

评估从万托林CFC转换为万托林HFA的临床效果,并比较万托林CFC、万托林HFA和安慰剂在哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

一项多中心、双盲、随机安全性和疗效试验,在313名12岁及以上且在3周导入期使用万托林CFC的哮喘患者中,比较万托林CFC、万托林HFA和安慰剂常规使用12周的情况。

结果

从万托林CFC转换为万托林HFA的患者维持了肺功能以及哮喘控制的其他指标,使其处于与导入期基线相当的水平。系列肺功能测试表明,在治疗第1天、第6周和第12周时,两种万托林治疗组的FEV1较基线的平均改善均显著大于安慰剂组(P <.001)。两个万托林组每次访视时的肺功能相当。所有治疗随着时间推移,用药前FEV1值均得以维持或改善。治疗耐受性良好。两种万托林治疗的不良事件谱与安慰剂相当。未观察到对心电图、生命体征或临床实验室检查有临床相关影响。万托林组的哮喘加重率为4%至5%,安慰剂组略高(8%)。

结论

从万托林CFC转换为万托林HFA的患者维持了相当的哮喘控制水平,且安全性相似。

相似文献

1
Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and effective in patients with asthma.从喘乐宁(含氯氟烃)转换为喘乐宁(氢氟烷烃)对哮喘患者耐受性良好且有效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Mar;86(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63302-9.
2
Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.HFA 沙丁胺醇长期治疗的安全性。
Chest. 1999 Apr;115(4):945-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.4.945.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol administered twice daily via hydrofluoroalkane 134a metered-dose inhaler in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗通过氢氟烷烃134a定量吸入器每日两次给药在青少年和成年持续性哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的12周研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.008.
4
Switching patients with asthma from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) albuterol to hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol.将哮喘患者从使用氯氟烃(CFC)沙丁胺醇转换为使用氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA)沙丁胺醇。
J Asthma. 1999;36(1):107-14. doi: 10.3109/02770909909065154.
5
Proventil HFA and ventolin have similar safety profiles during regular use.在常规使用过程中,喘乐宁气雾剂(Proventil HFA)和万托林(ventolin)具有相似的安全性。
Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):290-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.290.
6
Proventil HFA provides bronchodilation comparable to ventolin over 12 weeks of regular use in asthmatics.在哮喘患者中,定期使用12周后,喘乐宁HFA提供的支气管扩张作用与万托林相当。
Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):283-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.283.
7
Clinical comparability of ventolin formulated with hydrofluoroalkane or conventional chlorofluorocarbon propellants in children with asthma.使用氢氟烷烃或传统氯氟烃推进剂配制的万托林在哮喘儿童中的临床可比性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Dec;154(12):1219-25. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.12.1219.
8
Cumulative dose response study comparing HFA-134a albuterol sulfate and conventional CFC albuterol in patients with asthma.比较 HFA-134a 硫酸沙丁胺醇与传统 CFC 沙丁胺醇对哮喘患者累积剂量反应的研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Dec;81(6):593-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62711-1.
9
A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of HFA 134a albuterol and CFC albuterol in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients.单剂量的氢氟烷烃134a沙丁胺醇与氯氟烃沙丁胺醇在轻至中度哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 May;88(5):488-93. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62387-3.
10
Comparable bronchodilation with hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol and chlorofluorocarbons-11/12 (CFC) albuterol in children with asthma.哮喘儿童中氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA)沙丁胺醇与氯氟烃-11/12(CFC)沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张作用相当。
J Asthma. 2000 Dec;37(8):667-75. doi: 10.3109/02770900009087305.

引用本文的文献

1
Twelve- and 52-week safety of albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.沙丁胺醇多剂量干粉吸入器治疗持续性哮喘患者12周和52周的安全性
J Asthma. 2016;53(2):187-93. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1070862. Epub 2015 Sep 15.