Stentless or stented aortic valve implants in elderly patients?

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in indication and mid-term results between stentless and stented procedures in elderly patients, we followed aortic valve patients over a period of 5 years.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of 154 elderly aortic patients in regular sinus rhythm from 1992 to 1997, we inserted 103 stentless (Toronto SPVTM, St Jude Medical Inc., St Paul, Minneapolis, MN) and 51 stented (Carpentier-Edwards supra annular porcine, Baxter Inc., Irvine, CA) bioprostheses in the aortic position.

RESULTS

All 154 patients seemed preoperatively eligible for a stentless procedure. Mean age was 74.8 years (range 67-86 years) with a majority of female patients. The surgeon's (in)experience, major dilatation or calcifications of the ascending aorta and aberrant coronary anatomy were the most common reasons for drawback from the stentless procedure (51/154 patients). Aortic clamp time was significantly higher in the stentless vs. stented group (70 vs. 57 min, P < 0.0001). The large average 25.3 mm size of the stentless prostheses (vs. 23.7 mm stented) stands in full contrast with the low mean body surface area of 1.68 m2 (vs. 1.70 m2) of the patients. We encountered. respectively. 5 and 2 hospital-deaths (P = n.s.). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 66 months and was 97% complete, yielding, respectively, 302 and 139 patient-years. Survival (Kaplan-Meier method) was statistically higher in favor of the stentless procedures (log rank: P = 0.03). All survivors progressed markedly to a mean postoperative NYHA class 1.3 respectively, 1.4 (vs. preop. 3.3 and 3.2). Echocardiographic transvalvular gradients compared favorable for the stentless group in the small under 25 mm valves (P = 0.02 for 23 mm sized valves between groups) with improved left ventricular function and a significant decrease of left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD 48.0 vs. 56.5 mm) at 1 year follow-up. Cusp calcifications on control echocardiography were detected earlier (beyond 3 years) in the stented group, without signs of early significant regurgitation or dysfunction in both groups, except for one patient necessitating re-operation.

CONCLUSION

Although the implantation technique is much more demanding for stentless procedures, reflected by a longer aortic clamp-time, and remains impossible in some cases, elderly, small sized patients take full benefit of their large, non-obstructive prostheses.