Suppr超能文献

脑转移瘤的放射外科治疗:全脑放疗是否必要?

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: is whole brain radiotherapy necessary?

作者信息

Sneed P K, Lamborn K R, Forstner J M, McDermott M W, Chang S, Park E, Gutin P H, Phillips T L, Wara W M, Larson D A

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0226, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Feb 1;43(3):549-58. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00447-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Because whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) may cause dementia in long-term survivors, selected patients with brain metastases may benefit from initial treatment with radiosurgery (RS) alone reserving WBRT for salvage as needed. We reviewed results of RS +/- WBRT in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis to provide background for a prospective trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with single or multiple brain metastases managed initially with RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62 vs. 43 patients) from 1991 through February 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. The use of upfront WBRT depended on physician preference and referral patterns. Survival, freedom from progression (FFP) endpoints, and brain control allowing for successful salvage therapy were measured from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases. Actuarial curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses to adjust for known prognostic factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM) stratified by primary site.

RESULTS

Survival and local FFP were the same for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (median survival 11.3 vs. 11.1 months and 1-year local FFP by patient 71% vs. 79%, respectively). Brain FFP (scoring new metastases and/or local failure) was significantly worse for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (28% vs. 69% at 1 year; CPHM adjustedp = 0.03 and hazard ratio = 0.476). However, brain control allowing for successful salvage of a first failure was not significantly different for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62% vs. 73% at 1 year; CPHM adjusted p = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The omission of WBRT in the initial management of patients treated with RS for up to 4 brain metastases does not appear to compromise survival or intracranial control allowing for salvage therapy as indicated. A randomized trial of RS vs. RS + WBRT is needed to assess survival, quality of life, and cost in good-prognosis patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

摘要

目的

由于全脑放疗(WBRT)可能会导致长期存活者出现痴呆,部分脑转移患者可能从单纯初始放射外科治疗(RS)中获益,仅在必要时保留WBRT用于挽救治疗。我们回顾了新诊断脑转移患者接受RS±WBRT的结果,以为一项前瞻性试验提供背景资料。

方法和材料

回顾性分析了1991年至1997年2月期间最初单纯接受RS治疗与接受RS + WBRT治疗的单发或多发脑转移患者(分别为62例和43例)。是否 upfront 使用WBRT取决于医生的偏好和转诊模式。从脑转移诊断日期开始测量生存情况、无进展生存期(FFP)终点以及允许成功进行挽救治疗的脑控制情况。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计精算曲线。使用按原发部位分层的Cox比例风险模型(CPHM)对已知预后因素进行调整分析。

结果

单纯RS组与RS + WBRT组的生存情况和局部FFP相同(中位生存期分别为11.3个月和11.1个月,患者1年局部FFP分别为71%和79%)。单纯RS组的脑FFP(对新发转移灶和/或局部失败进行评分)明显差于RS + WBRT组(1年时分别为28%和69%;CPHM调整后p = 0.03,风险比 = 0.476)。然而,单纯RS组与RS + WBRT组在允许成功挽救首次失败的脑控制方面没有显著差异(1年时分别为62%和73%;CPHM调整后p = 0.56)。

结论

对于接受RS治疗的多达4个脑转移患者,在初始治疗中省略WBRT似乎不会影响生存或颅内控制,从而可以进行如所示的挽救治疗。需要对RS与RS + WBRT进行随机试验,以评估新诊断脑转移的预后良好患者的生存情况、生活质量和成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验