Surrey E S, Lee G S, Surrey M W, Hill D
Reproductive Medicine and Surgery Associates, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Feb;16(2):69-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1022512705515.
Our purpose was to assess whether in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET) candidate couples with basically normal semen analyses but failing zona-free hamster egg penetration assay (HEPA) scores benefit from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Twenty consecutive IVF candidate couples with normal-borderline semen analyses and failing HEPA scores were recruited. Mature oocytes obtained from each woman were randomly divided between ICSI (group I; n = 126 oocytes) and standard insemination techniques (group II; 138 oocytes). Fertilization (two pronuclei) and cleavage (2-4 cells) rates were assessed for both groups.
There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to (mean +/- standard error of the mean) fertilization (group I, 63.1 +/- 7.75; group II, 77.8 +/- 4.7%) or cleavage (group I, 87.3 +/- 2.4%; group II, 91.2 +/- 3.5%) rates.
ICSI is not beneficial for IVF-ET when sperm samples demonstrate a failing HEPA score but have normal or minimally compromised semen analysis parameters.
我们的目的是评估精液分析基本正常但无透明带仓鼠卵穿透试验(HEPA)评分失败的体外受精(IVF)-胚胎移植(ET)候选夫妇是否能从卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)中获益。
招募了20对连续的IVF候选夫妇,他们的精液分析处于正常临界值且HEPA评分失败。从每位女性获得的成熟卵母细胞被随机分为ICSI组(第I组;126个卵母细胞)和标准授精技术组(第II组;138个卵母细胞)。评估两组的受精(两个原核)和卵裂(2-4细胞)率。
两组在(平均±平均标准误)受精率(第I组,63.1±7.75;第II组,77.8±4.7%)或卵裂率(第I组,87.3±2.4%;第II组,91.2±3.5%)方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
当精子样本HEPA评分失败但精液分析参数正常或仅有轻微受损时,ICSI对IVF-ET并无益处。