• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声评估极低体重儿胎儿体重的准确性。

Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.

作者信息

Kaaij M W, Struijk P C, Lotgering F K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;13(2):99-102. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020099.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020099.x
PMID:10079487
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fetal outcome is inversely related to gestational age and birth weight. Therefore, in very small fetuses, estimated weight may play an important role in clinical management. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SUBJECTS

We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive infants with a birth weight of < 1000 g, at a gestational age between 24.0 and 34.0 weeks, in which biometric data < 2 weeks prior to delivery were available for analysis.

METHODS

We estimated fetal weight with the use of two methods--by those of Hadlock and colleagues and Scott and colleagues--and compared the estimated values with measured birth weights.

RESULTS

The infants had a mean birth weight of 742 +/- 173 (SD) g, at a gestational age of 28.1 +/- 2.0 (SD) weeks. With Hadlock's method, the mean estimated fetal weight (EFW) was 736 +/- 186 (SD) g, which was not significantly different from birth weight; the mean EFW error was 0.8 +/- 12.7 (SD) %. With Scott's method, the mean EFW was 780 +/- 185 (SD) g, which was significantly increased above birth weight; the mean EFW error was 5.7 +/- 12.5 (SD) %. The accuracy of the weight estimates was not significantly affected by the period between ultrasound examination and delivery if < 2 weeks, or by fetal growth restriction.

CONCLUSION

In our population of small fetuses, Hadlock's estimates of fetal weight correlated well with measured birth weight, whereas Scott's method tended to overestimate.

摘要

目的

胎儿结局与孕周和出生体重呈负相关。因此,对于极小的胎儿,估计体重在临床管理中可能起重要作用。我们的目的是确定超声估计极低体重儿胎儿体重的准确性。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

研究对象

我们回顾性研究了100例连续出生体重<1000g、孕周在24.0至34.0周之间的婴儿,这些婴儿在分娩前<2周有生物测量数据可供分析。

方法

我们使用两种方法估计胎儿体重——Hadlock及其同事的方法和Scott及其同事的方法——并将估计值与测量的出生体重进行比较。

结果

这些婴儿的平均出生体重为742±173(标准差)g,孕周为28.1±2.0(标准差)周。采用Hadlock方法时,平均估计胎儿体重(EFW)为736±186(标准差)g,与出生体重无显著差异;平均EFW误差为0.8±12.7(标准差)%。采用Scott方法时,平均EFW为780±185(标准差)g,显著高于出生体重;平均EFW误差为5.7±12.5(标准差)%。如果超声检查与分娩之间的间隔<2周,或胎儿生长受限,体重估计的准确性不受显著影响。

结论

在我们的小胎儿群体中,Hadlock对胎儿体重的估计与测量的出生体重相关性良好,而Scott的方法往往高估。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.超声评估极低体重儿胎儿体重的准确性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;13(2):99-102. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020099.x.
2
Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.正常妊娠中单次早期胎儿体重估计的预测价值。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Feb;130(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 May 23.
3
Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.胎儿体重估计:妊娠20 - 36周的参考范围及与实际出生体重参考范围的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):550-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.4019.
4
Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.超声检查不能准确预测双胎生长不一致情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0.
5
A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.一种用于计算体重≤1600克胎儿体重的新公式。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):775-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.1741.
6
Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term.足月引产前行临床及超声评估出生体重。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;29(3):304-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.3949.
7
The accuracy of gestation-adjusted projection method in estimating birth weight by sonographic fetal measurements in the third trimester.孕晚期超声测量胎儿参数的妊娠校正预测法在估计出生体重中的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Jun;90(6):1058-67.
8
Influence of ultrasound-to-delivery interval and maternal-fetal characteristics on validity of estimated fetal weight.超声至分娩间隔时间和母胎特征对估计胎儿体重准确性的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):434-41. doi: 10.1002/uog.7506.
9
The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age.超声估计极早早产儿体重的准确性:小于胎龄儿与适于胎龄儿的比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;54(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12198. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
10
Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.助产士进行的胎儿体重超声估计准确性良好。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(6):688-92. doi: 10.1080/00016340701322119.

引用本文的文献

1
A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.一种改良的产前生长评估评分,用于使用单一和复合生物测量参数评估孕晚期胎儿生长情况。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):745-54. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934218. Epub 2014 Jul 11.