Suppr超能文献

超声评估极低体重儿胎儿体重的准确性。

Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.

作者信息

Kaaij M W, Struijk P C, Lotgering F K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;13(2):99-102. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020099.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fetal outcome is inversely related to gestational age and birth weight. Therefore, in very small fetuses, estimated weight may play an important role in clinical management. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SUBJECTS

We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive infants with a birth weight of < 1000 g, at a gestational age between 24.0 and 34.0 weeks, in which biometric data < 2 weeks prior to delivery were available for analysis.

METHODS

We estimated fetal weight with the use of two methods--by those of Hadlock and colleagues and Scott and colleagues--and compared the estimated values with measured birth weights.

RESULTS

The infants had a mean birth weight of 742 +/- 173 (SD) g, at a gestational age of 28.1 +/- 2.0 (SD) weeks. With Hadlock's method, the mean estimated fetal weight (EFW) was 736 +/- 186 (SD) g, which was not significantly different from birth weight; the mean EFW error was 0.8 +/- 12.7 (SD) %. With Scott's method, the mean EFW was 780 +/- 185 (SD) g, which was significantly increased above birth weight; the mean EFW error was 5.7 +/- 12.5 (SD) %. The accuracy of the weight estimates was not significantly affected by the period between ultrasound examination and delivery if < 2 weeks, or by fetal growth restriction.

CONCLUSION

In our population of small fetuses, Hadlock's estimates of fetal weight correlated well with measured birth weight, whereas Scott's method tended to overestimate.

摘要

目的

胎儿结局与孕周和出生体重呈负相关。因此,对于极小的胎儿,估计体重在临床管理中可能起重要作用。我们的目的是确定超声估计极低体重儿胎儿体重的准确性。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

研究对象

我们回顾性研究了100例连续出生体重<1000g、孕周在24.0至34.0周之间的婴儿,这些婴儿在分娩前<2周有生物测量数据可供分析。

方法

我们使用两种方法估计胎儿体重——Hadlock及其同事的方法和Scott及其同事的方法——并将估计值与测量的出生体重进行比较。

结果

这些婴儿的平均出生体重为742±173(标准差)g,孕周为28.1±2.0(标准差)周。采用Hadlock方法时,平均估计胎儿体重(EFW)为736±186(标准差)g,与出生体重无显著差异;平均EFW误差为0.8±12.7(标准差)%。采用Scott方法时,平均EFW为780±185(标准差)g,显著高于出生体重;平均EFW误差为5.7±12.5(标准差)%。如果超声检查与分娩之间的间隔<2周,或胎儿生长受限,体重估计的准确性不受显著影响。

结论

在我们的小胎儿群体中,Hadlock对胎儿体重的估计与测量的出生体重相关性良好,而Scott的方法往往高估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验