Narvaez D, Getz I, Rest J R, Thoma S J
Department of Educational Psychology and Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Dev Psychol. 1999 Mar;35(2):478-88. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.2.478.
Moral judgment cannot be reduced to cultural ideology, or vice versa. But when each construct is measured separately, then combined, the product predicts powerfully to moral thinking. In Study 1, 2 churches (N = 96) were selected for their differences on religious ideology, political identity, and moral judgment. By combining these 3 variables, a multiple correlation of .79 predicted to members' moral thinking (opinions on human rights issues). Study 2 replicated this finding in a secular sample, with the formula established in Study 1 (R = .77). Individual conceptual development in moral judgment and socialization into cultural ideology co-occur, simultaneously and reciprocally, in parallel, and not serially. Individual development in moral judgment provides the epistemological categories for cultural ideology, which in turn influences the course of moral judgment, to produce moral thinking (e.g., opinions about abortion, free speech).
道德判断不能简化为文化意识形态，反之亦然。但是，当分别衡量每个结构，然后将它们结合起来时，所得结果能有力地预测道德思维。在研究1中，选取了两座教堂（N = 96），它们在宗教意识形态、政治身份和道德判断方面存在差异。通过将这三个变量结合起来，多重相关系数为0.79，可预测教友的道德思维（对人权问题的看法）。研究2在一个世俗样本中重复了这一发现，采用的公式与研究1相同（R = 0.77）。道德判断中的个体概念发展与文化意识形态的社会化同时、相互、并行且非串行地发生。道德判断中的个体发展为文化意识形态提供了认识论范畴，而文化意识形态反过来又影响道德判断的过程，从而产生道德思维（例如，关于堕胎、言论自由的观点）。
