Luke Dillon M, Gawronski Bertram
The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Oct;47(10):1520-1531. doi: 10.1177/0146167220987990. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Many real-world dilemmas involve disagreement about whether decisions should follow moral norms in an unconditional manner () or be based on the consequences for the greater good (). To examine how political ideology may account for some of these disagreements, the current research used a formal modeling approach to investigate the associations between political ideology and (a) sensitivity to consequences, (b) sensitivity to moral norms, and (c) general preference for inaction versus action in responses to moral dilemmas. Across three studies ( = 996) with samples from the United States (Studies 1 and 3) and the United Kingdom (Study 2), conservatives were less influenced by overall consequences for the greater good in comparison with liberals. Political ideology was not significantly associated with sensitivity to moral norms and general action tendencies. The findings provide more nuanced insights into how political ideology may contribute to disagreements on real-world moral dilemmas.
决策应该无条件地遵循道德规范(),还是基于对更大利益的后果()。为了研究政治意识形态如何解释这些分歧中的一些情况,当前的研究采用了一种形式化建模方法,来调查政治意识形态与以下方面的关联:(a)对后果的敏感度,(b)对道德规范的敏感度,以及(c)在应对道德困境时对不作为与行动的总体偏好。在三项研究(N = 996)中,研究样本来自美国(研究1和3)和英国(研究2),结果显示,与自由主义者相比,保守主义者受更大利益的总体后果影响较小。政治意识形态与对道德规范的敏感度以及总体行动倾向没有显著关联。这些发现为政治意识形态如何导致现实世界中道德困境的分歧提供了更细致入微的见解。