Chan Eugene Y
Monash Business School, Monash University, 26 Sir John Monash Dr., Caulfield East, VIC 3145, Australia.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102867. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
Prior research has reported that political conservatives rely on a deontological approach to resolving moral dilemmas by favoring moral rules and moral edicts rather than expressing a willingness to sacrifice one life in order to save multiple others. In the current research, we sought to firstly demonstrate the underlying process and secondly to clarify the exact nature of the link between political ideology and deontological ethics. In Study 1, political conservatism predicted deontological judgments because of greater intuition. That is, conservatives think rather intuitively, and intuitive thinking is one antecedent to deontological judgments when resolving moral dilemmas. Following, in Study 2, we demonstrate that only social-not fiscal-conservatism predicts intuition and thus deontological ethics. Accordingly, we tease apart the typical left-right measure of political ideology into its two key aspects and argue that only the social but not fiscal dimensions predicts intuition and deontological ethics. We are not the first authors to suggest the existence of a link between political conservatism and moral processing, but we are the first to suggest an explanation and the first to clarify which aspect of conservatism is associated with deontological ethics.
先前的研究报告称,政治保守派依靠义务论方法来解决道德困境,他们倾向于道德规则和道德法令,而不是表示愿意牺牲一条生命以拯救更多人。在当前的研究中,我们首先试图证明其潜在过程,其次是阐明政治意识形态与义务论伦理之间联系的确切性质。在研究1中,政治保守主义由于更强的直觉而预测了义务论判断。也就是说,保守派的思考更直观,而在解决道德困境时,直观思维是义务论判断的一个前提。接下来,在研究2中,我们证明只有社会保守主义而非财政保守主义能预测直觉,进而预测义务论伦理。因此,我们将政治意识形态的典型左右衡量标准细分为两个关键方面,并认为只有社会维度而非财政维度能预测直觉和义务论伦理。我们不是第一个提出政治保守主义与道德处理之间存在联系的作者,但我们是第一个提出解释的,也是第一个阐明保守主义的哪个方面与义务论伦理相关的。