Suppr超能文献

延迟性肌肉酸痛:治疗性超声对人体无效。

Delayed onset muscle soreness: lack of effect of therapeutic ultrasound in humans.

作者信息

Craig J A, Bradley J, Walsh D M, Baxter G D, Allen J M

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Mar;80(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90144-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of two dosages of pulsed ultrasound therapy (1 MHz, spatial averaged peak intensity 0.8 W/cm2, mark space ratio of 1:4) on acute-stage delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS).

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

SETTING

Laboratory of a university physiotherapy department.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight healthy volunteers (24 men, 24 women) with no arm pathology or pain at the time of the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: control, placebo (sham insonation), low-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 172.8 J), or high-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 345.6 J). DOMS was induced in the nondominant elbow flexors in a standardized fashion through repeated eccentric exercise until exhaustion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Elbow extension, flexion, and resting angles (universal goniometer), pain (visual analogue scale), mechanical pain threshold/tenderness (pressure algometer), and a McGill pain questionnaire. Measurements were taken before and after treatment each day except for the McGill pain questionnaire, which was completed at the end of the trial.

RESULTS

Significant differences were seen between groups in relation to range of flexion (p = .0032), with the control group losing least range of flexion. There were no other significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

No convincing evidence was found to support the use of pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of DOMS at the parameters discussed here.

摘要

目的

探讨两种剂量的脉冲超声治疗(1兆赫,空间平均峰值强度0.8瓦/平方厘米,占空比1:4)对急性延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)的影响。

设计

双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验。

地点

一所大学物理治疗系实验室。

参与者

48名健康志愿者(24名男性,24名女性),研究时无手臂病变或疼痛。

干预措施

受试者被随机分配到四个治疗组之一:对照组、安慰剂组(假超声照射)、低剂量脉冲超声组(平均剂量172.8焦耳)或高剂量脉冲超声组(平均剂量345.6焦耳)。通过重复离心运动直至疲劳,以标准化方式在非优势侧肘屈肌诱发DOMS。

主要观察指标

肘伸展、屈曲和静息角度(通用角度计)、疼痛(视觉模拟评分)、机械性疼痛阈值/压痛(压力痛觉计)以及麦吉尔疼痛问卷。除麦吉尔疼痛问卷在试验结束时完成外,每天在治疗前后进行测量。

结果

在屈曲范围方面,各组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0032),对照组屈曲范围损失最小。各组之间无其他显著差异。

结论

未发现有令人信服的证据支持在此处讨论的参数下使用脉冲超声治疗DOMS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验