Suppr超能文献

能量色散光谱法的无标准定量电子激发X射线微分析:其恰当作用是什么?

Standardless Quantitative Electron-Excited X-ray Microanalysis by Energy-Dispersive Spectrometry: What Is Its Proper Role?

作者信息

Newbury DE

机构信息

Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building 222, Room A113, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

出版信息

Microsc Microanal. 1998 Nov;4(6):585-597. doi: 10.1017/s1431927698980564.

Abstract

: Electron beam X-ray microanalysis with semiconductor energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) performed with standards and calculated matrix corrections can yield quantitative results with a distribution such that 95% of analyses fall within +/-5% relative for major and minor constituents. Standardless methods substitute calculations for the standard intensities, based either on physical models of X-ray generation and propagation (first principles) or on mathematical fits to remotely measured standards (fitted standards). Error distributions have been measured for three different standardless analysis procedures with a suite of microanalysis standards including metal alloys, glasses, minerals, ceramics, and stoichiometric compounds. For the first-principles standardless procedure, the error distribution placed 95% of analyses within +/-50% relative, whereas for two commercial fitted standards procedures, the error distributions placed 95% of analyses within +/-25% relative. The implication of these error distributions for the accuracy of analytical results is considered, and recommendations for the use of standardless analysis are given.

摘要

采用标准样品并进行计算基体校正的半导体能量色散光谱法(EDS)进行电子束X射线微分析,对于主要和次要成分,可得出定量结果,其分布情况为95%的分析结果相对误差在±5%以内。无标样方法用计算代替标准强度,计算要么基于X射线产生和传播的物理模型(第一原理),要么基于对远程测量标准样品的数学拟合(拟合标准样品)。使用一套包括金属合金、玻璃、矿物、陶瓷和化学计量化合物在内的微分析标准样品,对三种不同的无标样分析程序测量了误差分布。对于第一原理无标样程序,误差分布使95%的分析结果相对误差在±50%以内,而对于两种商业拟合标准样品程序,误差分布使95%的分析结果相对误差在±25%以内。考虑了这些误差分布对分析结果准确性的影响,并给出了无标样分析使用的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验