Streit A, Stern C D
Department of Genetics and Development, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Trends Genet. 1999 Jan;15(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01620-5.
Since the discovery of the phenomenon of neural induction by Spemann and Mangold in 1924, considerable effort has been invested in identifying the signals produced by the organizer that are responsible for diverting the fate of cells from epidermal to neural. Substantial progress has been made only recently by the finding in amphibians that BMP4 is a neural inhibitor and epidermal inducer, and that endogenous antagonists of BMPs are secreted by the organizer. However, recent results in the chick point to the existence of other, upstream events required before BMP inhibition stabilizes neural fates. Here we take a critical view of the evidence for and against the view that BMP inhibition is a sufficient trigger for neural induction in different vertebrates.
自1924年施佩曼和曼戈尔德发现神经诱导现象以来,人们投入了大量精力来确定组织者产生的负责将细胞命运从表皮转变为神经的信号。直到最近在两栖动物中发现BMP4是一种神经抑制因子和表皮诱导因子,且组织者会分泌BMP的内源性拮抗剂,才取得了实质性进展。然而,最近在鸡身上的研究结果表明,在BMP抑制稳定神经命运之前,还存在其他上游事件。在这里,我们批判性地审视了支持和反对BMP抑制是不同脊椎动物神经诱导充分触发因素这一观点的证据。