Chadwick D
Department of Neurological Science, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK.
Brain. 1999 Mar;122 ( Pt 3):441-8. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.441.
One thousand and thirteen patients, in remission of epilepsy for at least 2 years, were randomized to continued therapy or slow withdrawal over 6 months and were followed up for a median period of 5 years. At the time of randomization 83% of patients were receiving monotherapy with carbamazepine (237 patients), phenobarbitone/primidone (72 patients), phenytoin (184 patients) or valproate (228 patients) in low doses, and plasma levels were below the usual optimal range. The most important factor determining seizure recurrence was continued therapy, which was the case for barbiturates, phenytoin and valproate. There was no significant difference for patients taking carbamazepine at randomization, because of a low rate of recurrence in those withdrawing treatment. The difference between carbamazepine and other drugs was not explained by differences in covariate prognostic factors. There was no evidence that withdrawal of phenobarbitone was associated with withdrawal seizures. These data provide unique evidence for the effectiveness of standard antiepileptic drugs as monotherapy. The results for carbamazepine may be open to a number of interpretations.
1013例癫痫缓解至少2年的患者被随机分为继续治疗组或在6个月内缓慢撤药组,并进行了为期5年的中位随访。随机分组时,83%的患者接受低剂量卡马西平(237例)、苯巴比妥/扑米酮(72例)、苯妥英(184例)或丙戊酸盐(228例)单药治疗,血浆水平低于通常的最佳范围。决定癫痫复发的最重要因素是继续治疗,巴比妥类、苯妥英和丙戊酸盐都是这种情况。随机分组时服用卡马西平的患者没有显著差异,因为撤药治疗的患者复发率较低。卡马西平和其他药物之间的差异不能用协变量预后因素的差异来解释。没有证据表明苯巴比妥撤药与撤药发作有关。这些数据为标准抗癫痫药物作为单药治疗的有效性提供了独特证据。卡马西平的结果可能有多种解释。