Ware N C, Tugenberg T, Dickey B, McHorney C A
Department of Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Mar;50(3):395-400. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.3.395.
As a step toward developing a standardized measure of continuity of care for mental health services research, the study sought to identify the interpersonal processes of giving and receiving day-to-day services through which individual providers create experiences of continuity for consumers.
Ethnographic methods of field observation and open-ended interviewing were used to investigate the meaning of continuity of care. Observations were carried out at two community mental health centers and a psychiatric emergency evaluation unit in Boston. Sixteen recipients and 16 providers of services at these sites were interviewed.
Six mechanisms of continuity were identified, labeled, defined, and described through analysis of field notes and interview transcripts: pinch hitting, trouble shooting, smoothing transitions, creating flexibility, speeding the system up, and contextualizing. The mechanisms elaborate dimensions and principles of continuity cited by other observers and also suggest new formulations.
The mechanisms identified in this study facilitate operationalization of the concept of continuity of care by specifying its meaning through empirically derived indicators. Ethnography promises to be a valuable methodological tool in constructing valid and reliable measures for use in mental health services research.
作为朝着开发一种用于心理健康服务研究的标准化连续性护理测量方法迈出的一步,该研究旨在确定日常服务提供与接受的人际过程,个体提供者通过这些过程为消费者创造连续性体验。
采用实地观察和开放式访谈的人种学方法来调查连续性护理的意义。观察在波士顿的两个社区心理健康中心和一个精神科急诊评估单元进行。对这些场所的16名服务接受者和16名服务提供者进行了访谈。
通过对实地记录和访谈记录的分析,确定、标记、定义并描述了六种连续性机制:临时替代、故障排除、平稳过渡、创造灵活性、加快系统运行以及情境化。这些机制阐述了其他观察者所提及的连续性维度和原则,同时也提出了新的表述。
本研究中确定的机制通过经验得出的指标明确其含义,有助于实现连续性护理概念的可操作性。人种学有望成为构建用于心理健康服务研究的有效且可靠测量方法的宝贵方法工具。