Department of Children, Youth and Families, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, 669 W. 34th Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0411, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Mar;46(2):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0909-3.
Pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services are increasingly being developed to establish comparative effectiveness, influence sustainable implementation, and address real world policy decisions. However, use of time and resource intensive qualitative methods in pragmatic trials may be inconsistent with the aims of efficiency and cost minimization. This paper introduces a qualitative method known as Rapid Assessment Procedure-Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) that combines the techniques of Rapid Assessment Procedures with clinical ethnography. A case study is presented to illustrate how RAPICE can be used to efficiently understand pragmatic trial implementation processes and associated real world policy implications.
越来越多的心理健康服务实用临床试验被开发出来,以确定其比较效果,影响可持续实施,并解决现实世界的政策决策。然而,在实用试验中使用时间和资源密集型的定性方法可能不符合效率和成本最小化的目的。本文介绍了一种定性方法,称为快速评估程序信息临床民族志(RAPICE),它将快速评估程序的技术与临床民族志相结合。通过一个案例研究说明了如何使用 RAPICE 来有效地理解实用试验实施过程及其相关的现实世界政策影响。