Bradley J M, Wallace E S, Elborn J S, Howard J L, McCoy M P
University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland.
Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Jan-Mar;168(1):25-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02939576.
This retrospective audit was undertaken to compare the efficacy of home intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy, hospital i.v. antibiotic therapy and a combination of these 2 approaches, as determined by spirometric measures of lung function in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, each with an acute respiratory exacerbation.
Pulmonary function, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow rate between 25 per cent and 75 per cent of vital capacity (FEF25-75), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were compared between groups at the beginning and at the end of an IV antibiotic course.
Treatment of exacerbations resulted in a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in lung function irrespective of where patients were treated. The percentage improvement in FEV1, FVC, and FEF25-75, were significantly greater in patients treated in hospital compared to those who had home i.v. treatment (p < 0.05).
Hospital i.v. antibiotic therapy resulted in greater improvements in FEV1, FVC and FEF25-75 than home i.v. antibiotic therapy in CF patients with an acute respiratory infection.
本次回顾性审计旨在比较家庭静脉注射抗生素治疗、医院静脉注射抗生素治疗以及这两种方法联合使用的疗效,疗效通过囊性纤维化(CF)急性呼吸道加重患者的肺功能肺活量测定指标来确定。
在静脉抗生素疗程开始时和结束时,比较各组之间的肺功能、用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、肺活量25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量(FEF25-75)以及呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。
无论患者在何处接受治疗,病情加重的治疗均导致肺功能显著改善(p < 0.05)。与接受家庭静脉治疗的患者相比,在医院接受治疗的患者FEV1、FVC和FEF25-75的改善百分比显著更高(p < 0.05)。
对于患有急性呼吸道感染的CF患者,医院静脉注射抗生素治疗在FEV1、FVC和FEF25-75方面的改善比家庭静脉注射抗生素治疗更大。