Suppr超能文献

医疗事故与缺血性坏死:法律结果

Malpractice and avascular necrosis: legal outcomes.

作者信息

Carter R M

机构信息

Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan-Feb;13(1):79-84. doi: 10.1155/1999/517893.

Abstract

Every physician, but particularly specialists, have reason to be concerned about medical legal issues. Avascular necrosis has been established as a possible serious complication of steroid treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. Two specific Canadian cases illustrating the sequence of medical history, time, expert testimony and legal outcomes are presented. Awards plus costs in the order of $1 million or more were the result of these legal proceedings. The courts stated the major factors in finding liability against doctors were the failure to show the patient had been fully informed of treatment options. There was considerable weight given to expert testimony and the patient recollection of events to support their contentions. Adequate contemporaneous record keeping was absent to contradict evidence of the patients. The judges in both illustrative examples leaned heavily on Supreme Court of Canada guidelines whereby the patient must be informed at all stages of the medical process.

摘要

每位医生,尤其是专科医生,都有理由关注医疗法律问题。无血管性坏死已被确认为炎症性肠病类固醇治疗可能出现的严重并发症。本文介绍了两个具体的加拿大案例,阐述了病史、时间、专家证词和法律结果的先后顺序。这些法律诉讼导致了高达100万美元或更多的赔偿及费用。法院指出,判定医生有责任的主要因素是未能向患者充分告知治疗选择。专家证词以及患者对事件的回忆对支持他们的主张起到了相当大的作用。缺乏充分的同期记录来反驳患者的证据。在这两个示例案例中,法官都严重依赖加拿大最高法院的指导方针,即患者必须在医疗过程的各个阶段都得到告知。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验