Brenner R James
University of California, San Francisco, UCSF-Mt. Zion Hospital, Radiology H2804, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94115-1667, USA.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Sep;4(9):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.016.
The origins of the use of expert witnesses to assist courts in helping understand the required conduct in determining the standard of care provides a basis for recognizing the consultant role sought in judicial proceedings. Both rules of evidence and court decisions have evolved in a manner that encourages the introduction of expert testimony while conditioning its use to avoid unfair bias. Trial court judges decide on permitting such testimony, while legal counsel is responsible for helping juries determine its importance and reliability. Certain types of restrictions and adverse consequences for misstatements exist but are subordinated to the trial process in most circumstances, a process that varies among different jurisdictions.
使用专家证人协助法庭理解确定护理标准所需行为的起源,为认可司法程序中寻求的顾问角色提供了依据。证据规则和法院判决都以鼓励引入专家证言的方式演变,同时对其使用加以限制以避免不公平的偏见。初审法院法官决定是否允许此类证言,而法律顾问负责帮助陪审团确定其重要性和可靠性。对于错误陈述存在某些类型的限制和不利后果,但在大多数情况下都服从于审判程序,不同司法管辖区的审判程序各不相同。