Redelmeier D A, Tu J V, Schull M J, Ferris L E, Hux J E
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2001 Mar 20;164(6):809-13.
Ordinary human reasoning may lead patients to provide an unreliable history of past experiences because of errors in comprehension, recall, evaluation and expression. Comprehension of a question may change depending on the definition of periods of time and prior questions. Recall fails through the loss of relevant information, the fabrication of misinformation and distracting cues. Evaluations may be mistaken because of the "halo effect" and a reluctance to change personal beliefs. Expression is influenced by social culture and the environment. These errors can also occur when patients report a history of present illness, but they tend to be more prominent with experiences that are more remote. An awareness of these specific human fallibilities might help clinicians avoid some errors when eliciting a patient's past medical history.
普通的人类推理可能会导致患者提供不可靠的既往经历史,原因在于理解、回忆、评估和表达方面的错误。对问题的理解可能会因时间段的定义和先前问题而改变。回忆会因相关信息的丢失、错误信息的编造和干扰线索而失败。评估可能会因“光环效应”和不愿改变个人信念而出现错误。表达会受到社会文化和环境的影响。这些错误在患者汇报现病史时也可能发生,但在更久远的经历中往往更为突出。意识到这些人类特有的易犯错之处,可能有助于临床医生在获取患者既往病史时避免一些错误。