Levinkind M, Owens J, Morea C, Addy M, Lang N P, Adair R, Barton I
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Bristol, England.
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Mar;26(3):177-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260308.x.
These studies sought to develop and validate an occlusal site-specific plaque index to be used to measure plaque removal by brushing or chewing gum. The index divides the occlusal surfaces into imaginary zones from which scores are apportioned on a 0-4 basis dependent on the perceived % plaque coverage of each zone. Examiner calibration was conducted over 2 studies assessing inter-examiner reproducibility and intra-examiner repeatibility, respectively. Study 1 involved 2 examiners who recorded scores from the same 3 groups of subjects who had suspended tooth cleaning for 4 days. Analyses for inter-examiner reproducibility showed no significant mean differences between examiners or no significant differences between variances of the 2 examiners scores. Study 2 involved the same 2 examiners individually scoring 3 groups of subjects 2 x (approximately 60 min apart) for occlusal plaque. Analysis for intra-examiner repeatability showed no significant mean differences between the 2 scorings of each examiner. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the variances of each examiner's scores except for 1 examiner in the repeatability exercise for the 1st group of subjects. Study 3 involved groups of subjects at 2 separate clinical sites (Bristol, England and Berne, Switzerland) being scored for occlusal plaque before and after toothbrushing with water or after no toothbrushing. Data from individual examiners and examiners combined revealed a significant reduction in occlusal plaque with brushing compared to no brushing. Study 4 was the same as study 3 but occlusal plaque was scored before and after chewing gum or not chewing gum. The Bristol examiner recorded a significant reduction in plaque by chewing gum compared to not chewing gum but the Berne examiner did not. The latter may have resulted from a considerable disparity in the number of evaluable occlusal surfaces between the two study sites. The index could be employed as part of the overall assessment or oral hygiene or used in clinical trials to study mechanical and chemical plaque control agents.
这些研究旨在开发并验证一种用于测量刷牙或咀嚼口香糖后牙合面特定部位菌斑清除情况的菌斑指数。该指数将牙合面划分为若干虚拟区域,根据各区域菌斑覆盖的百分比在0至4分的基础上进行评分。在两项研究中分别进行了检查者校准,以评估检查者间的可重复性和检查者内的重复性。研究1中,2名检查者对3组连续4天未刷牙的受试者进行评分。检查者间可重复性分析显示,检查者之间的平均得分无显著差异,两名检查者评分的方差也无显著差异。研究2中,同样是这2名检查者分别对3组受试者的牙合面菌斑进行评分,两次评分间隔约60分钟。检查者内重复性分析显示,每位检查者的两次评分之间平均得分无显著差异。此外,除了在第一组受试者重复性测试中有1名检查者外,每位检查者评分的方差之间无显著差异。研究3中,在两个不同临床地点(英国布里斯托尔和瑞士伯尔尼)的几组受试者,分别在用水刷牙前后或未刷牙前后进行牙合面菌斑评分。个体检查者和合并检查者的数据均显示,与未刷牙相比,刷牙后牙合面菌斑显著减少。研究4与研究3相同,但在咀嚼口香糖前后或未咀嚼口香糖前后进行牙合面菌斑评分。布里斯托尔的检查者记录显示,与未咀嚼口香糖相比,咀嚼口香糖后菌斑显著减少,但伯尔尼的检查者未观察到这一结果。后者可能是由于两个研究地点可评估牙合面数量存在较大差异所致。该指数可作为口腔卫生总体评估的一部分,或用于临床试验中研究机械和化学菌斑控制剂。