Gaertner S L, Dovidio J F, Rust M C, Nier J A, Banker B S, Ward C M, Mottola G R, Houlette M
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark 19716, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):388-402. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.388.
The authors examined the potentially separable contributions of 2 elements of intergroup cooperation, interaction and common fate, and the processes through which they can operate. The manipulation of interaction reduced bias in evaluative ratings, which supports the idea that these components are separable, whereas the manipulation of common fate when the groups were interacting was associated with lower bias in nonverbal facial reactions in response to contributions by in-group and out-group members. Whereas interaction activated several processes that can lead to reduced bias, including decategorization, consistent with the common in-group identity model (S. L. Gaertner, J. F. Dovidio, P. A. Anastasio, B. A. Bachman, & M. C. Rust, 1993) as well as M. Hewstone and R. J. Brown's (1986) group differentiation model, the primary set of mediators involved participants' representations of the memberships as 2 subgroups within a superordinate entity.
