Rationing. Politicians, not doctors, must make the decisions about rationing.
作者信息
Rao J N
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.940.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rationing. Politicians, not doctors, must make the decisions about rationing.定量配给。必须由政治家而非医生做出关于定量配给的决策。
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.940.
2
Rationing health care: the political perspective.医疗保健配给：政治视角
Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):876-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073002.
3
It takes a giraffe to see the big picture - citizens' view on decision makers in health care rationing.高瞻远瞩——公民对医疗资源配置决策者的看法
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.043. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
4
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.配给制辩论。国民医疗服务体系内的配给制应该是明确的。支持的理由。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.
5
The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for.配给制辩论。中央政府在配给决策中应发挥更大作用。支持理由。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):967-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.967.
6
Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?瑞典医疗保健中的优先事项设定：政治家们准备好了吗？
Scand J Public Health. 2014 May;42(3):227-34. doi: 10.1177/1403494813520355. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Rationing in health care.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Jan;3(1):58-9. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300112.
8
Rationing health care. Politicians do not want to duck the issues.医疗资源配给。政治家们不想回避这些问题。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557.
9
Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing.瑞典公民、医疗保健领域的政治家、管理人员及医生对医疗资源配给与医疗保健融资的看法。
Health Expect. 2002 Jun;5(2):148-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00169.x.
10
Public discussion of rationing decisions is essential.对配给决策进行公开讨论至关重要。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7024.184.
引用本文的文献
1
Rationing of expensive medical care in a transition country--nihil novum?转型国家中昂贵医疗服务的配给——难道没有新情况？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):308-12. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.308.
2
Limits to demand for health care. Rationing is needed in a national health service.医疗保健需求的限制。国家医疗服务体系需要进行配给。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 24;322(7288):734; author reply 735.
本文引用的文献
1
2
3
Some NHS care is unacceptable.一些国民保健制度的护理服务是不可接受的。
BMJ. 1998 Nov 21;317(7170):1460E. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1460e.
4
Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process.理清优先事项。为何我们必须承认配给是一个政治过程。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 10;317(7164):959-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7164.959.
5
Managing care--should we adopt a new ethic?
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):397-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808063390608.
6
Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing.巧妙应对：在资源分配中找到恰当平衡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):83-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.83.
7
Setting priorities in the NHS. A framework for decision making. Summary and recommendations of a report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians.英国国家医疗服务体系中的优先事项设定。决策框架。皇家内科医师学院一个工作小组报告的总结与建议。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):379-80.
8
Rationing: the case for "muddling through elegantly".定量配给：“巧妙应付”的理由。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.811.
Zotero 插件