The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for.
作者信息
Lenaghan J
机构信息
Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
出版信息
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):967-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.967.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for.配给制辩论。中央政府在配给决策中应发挥更大作用。支持理由。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):967-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.967.
2
The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case against.配给制辩论。中央政府在配给决策中应发挥更大作用。反对观点。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):970-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.970.
3
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
4
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.配给制辩论。国民医疗服务体系内的配给制应该是明确的。支持的理由。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.
5
6
The HSJ interview: Dr Evan Harris. Gruel intentions. Interview by Lyn Whitfield.《卫生服务杂志》访谈：埃文·哈里斯博士。稀粥计划。林恩·惠特菲尔德访谈
Health Serv J. 2003 May 22;113(5856):20-2.
7
The nature of procedural preferences for health-care rationing decisions.医疗资源分配决策中程序偏好的本质。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):223-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.036.
8
Rationing and unfairness in the National Health Service: who is responsible, who is to blame and what can be done about it?国民医疗服务体系中的配给与不公平：谁负责、谁之过以及如何应对？
J Nurs Manag. 1996 Jul;4(4):187-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1996.tb00049.x.
9
Rationing health care: from needs to markets? The politics of destruction: rationing in the UK health care market.医疗保健配给：从需求到市场？破坏的政治：英国医疗保健市场中的配给
Health Care Anal. 1995 Nov;3(4):299-308; discussion 309-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02197076.
10
Public opinion and rationing in the United Kingdom.英国的公众舆论与医疗资源配给
Health Policy. 1999 Dec;50(1-2):39-53. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00063-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.全科医生的床边资源分配：丹麦公共医疗系统中的一项邮寄调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-192.
2
Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and clinicians.评估供体肝脏移植分配的优先事项：公众与临床医生调查
BMJ. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):172-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7152.172.
Zotero 插件