Rakich J S, Becker E R, Rakich C N
College of Business Administration, University of Ohio.
Hosp Top. 1990 Winter;68(1):7-14. doi: 10.1080/00185868.1990.10544097.
During the three-year period 1985-1987, there were 238 elections in nongovernmental, short-term hospitals to determine whether or not unions would represent the employees. Unions had a success rate of 47.1 percent, similar to that of earlier years. This study reports these election results by hospital and election characteristics. For hospitals, the analysis includes elections by census region, ownership, bed size, and multi-institutional characteristics. For elections, the analysis includes the nature and type of election, employee organization, and employee bargaining-unit-size characteristics. This study concludes that the number of union elections decline as hospital bed size increases, and the union success rate is curvilinear and higher in both small and very large hospitals; union success declines as bargaining-unit size increases. Investor-owned and nonprofit, religious hospitals that are members of multi-institutional systems have lower union success rates than nonsystem hospitals do in their ownership category. However, unions are much more successful in multi-union and decertification elections compared with single-unit elections and initial recognition elections.
在1985年至1987年的三年期间,非政府短期医院举行了238次选举,以确定工会是否将代表员工。工会的成功率为47.1%,与前些年相似。本研究按医院和选举特征报告了这些选举结果。对于医院,分析包括按普查地区、所有权、床位规模和多机构特征进行的选举。对于选举,分析包括选举的性质和类型、员工组织以及员工谈判单位规模特征。本研究得出结论,随着医院床位规模的增加,工会选举的数量下降,工会成功率呈曲线状,在小型和大型医院中都较高;随着谈判单位规模的增加,工会成功几率下降。与非系统医院相比,多机构系统中的投资者所有和非营利性宗教医院的工会成功率较低。然而,与单一单位选举和初次认可选举相比,工会在多工会和撤销认证选举中更为成功。