Public light and private dark: the privatization of home health services for the elderly in the U.S.

The privatization of health care has been a controversial topic that has consumed an increasing share of national attention in both the United Kingdom and the United States. In this paper we consider several definitions of privatization; outline two strategies of privatization--privatization by replacement and privatization by reduction or attrition; identify possible consequences of various policies of privatization for health and social services for the elderly; and offer some ideas about how trends toward privatization may be assessed, utilizing empirical data from research on the impact of medical cost containment and privatization on community-based services in the U.S. That the substance of government policy is moving toward privatization is without question; that these policies may have serious consequences for outcomes of social equity is still under debate. The trends suggested in our research have potentially negative consequences for marginal elderly clients in U.S. If the consequences of privatization can be linked to the denial of service to needy clients, privatization may, indeed, represent a dark alternative to the welfare state.