• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私有化、系统成员资格与老年人获得家庭医疗保健服务

Privatization, system membership, and access to home health care for the elderly.

作者信息

Estes C L, Swan J H

机构信息

Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0612.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):277-98.

PMID:8007900
Abstract

Home health agency (HHA) access based on organizational and market factors is considered, employing a theoretical model of isomorphism for organizational factors and ecological and economic theories for market factors. Data derive from 1986 and 1987 telephone surveys that randomly sampled 185 HHAs from nine metropolitan areas in five states. Results show that competition limits restrictions on access; for-profit status and system membership increase the likelihood that clients will be refused for financial reasons. Findings support the isomorphism theory that fewer access and other behavioral differences appear within systems: nonprofits and for-profits tend to behave alike within systems, whereas freestanding nonprofits are less likely than their for-profit counterparts to refuse access. Findings for system members may account for some of the problems of legitimacy experienced by nonprofit health care organizations.

摘要

基于组织和市场因素的家庭健康机构(HHA)准入情况得到了研究,采用了组织因素的同构理论模型以及市场因素的生态和经济理论。数据来源于1986年和1987年的电话调查,这些调查从五个州的九个大都市地区随机抽取了185家家庭健康机构。结果表明,竞争限制了准入限制;营利性地位和系统成员身份增加了客户因财务原因被拒绝的可能性。研究结果支持同构理论,即在系统内准入和其他行为差异较少:非营利组织和营利组织在系统内的行为往往相似,而独立的非营利组织比营利组织更不可能拒绝准入。系统成员的研究结果可能解释了非营利性医疗保健组织所经历的一些合法性问题。

相似文献

1
Privatization, system membership, and access to home health care for the elderly.私有化、系统成员资格与老年人获得家庭医疗保健服务
Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):277-98.
2
Public light and private dark: the privatization of home health services for the elderly in the U.S.公共之光与私人之暗:美国老年人家庭健康服务的私有化
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1990;11(3-4):7-33. doi: 10.1300/J027v11n03_02.
3
Running as fast as they can: organizational changes in home health care.尽他们所能地快速发展:家庭医疗保健中的组织变革。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1992;13(1-2):35-69.
4
Mechanisms behind privatization: a case study of private growth in Swedish elderly care.私有化背后的机制:瑞典老年护理领域私营化发展的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
5
Exploring limits to market-based reform: managed competition and rehabilitation home care services in Ontario.探索基于市场的改革的局限性:安大略省的管理式竞争与康复家庭护理服务
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(7):1594-604. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.042. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
6
Privatization of social services: quality differences in Swedish elderly care.社会服务的私有化:瑞典老年护理中的质量差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
Healthcare organizational change: implications for access to care and its measurement.医疗保健组织变革:对医疗服务可及性及其衡量的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Aug;33(3 Pt 2):653-80; discussion 681-4.
8
Managed care and the delivery of primary care to the elderly and the chronically ill.管理式医疗与为老年人和慢性病患者提供初级保健服务
Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt Ii):322-53.
9
Informal care substitution: what we don't know can hurt us.非正式护理替代:我们所不知道的可能会伤害我们。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1994;6(4):21-31.
10
Nonprofit conversion: theory, evidence, and state policy options.非营利性转变:理论、证据及国家政策选择
Health Serv Res. 1998 Dec;33(5 Pt 2):1495-535.

引用本文的文献

1
Political perspectives on uncertified home care agencies.关于未经认证的家庭护理机构的政治观点。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Fall;16(1):223-45.