Stolt Ragnar, Winblad Ulrika
Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala Science Park, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
For many years the Swedish Welfare State has been associated with a welfare model in which the public sector dominates both the provision and financing of the elderly care system. However, influenced by the ongoing trend of New Public Management, the past 15 years have been characterized by governmental regimes encouraging competition and as a result there has been a substantial increase in private providers. This case study on elderly care in Sweden provides new insights into the mechanisms behind the spread and growth of privatization. Our results show that in 1990 only 1% of the labour force in the elderly care sector was employed by private organizations, in comparison to 2003 when the private share had increased to 13%. The accompanying organizational changes have been controversial and are often criticized. In general, left-wing politicians have frequently defended the traditional welfare model dominated by public providers, whereas right-wing politicians have urged for a larger share of alternative providers. In this study, statistics between the years 1990 and 2003 were used to model the relationship between privatization and a number of economic, political and social/demographic variables. The results from regression and diffusion analysis imply that privately managed elderly care has established itself mainly in metropolitan areas dominated by right-wing regimes. Surprisingly, neighbouring municipalities tend to follow these pioneers irrespective of their political colour or economic situation. In fact, after shifting political power many of those neighbouring municipalities dominated by left-wing regimes not only maintain an abundance of private contractors but also encourage a continued process of contracting out publicly managed elderly care units. As a result, clusters of municipalities with an increasing degree of privatization arise despite political and economic differences. In conclusion, geographical proximity seems to be an important variable in addition to population density, ideology and financial situation when privatization reforms are implemented in the Swedish elderly care system.
多年来,瑞典福利国家一直与一种福利模式相关联,在这种模式中,公共部门在老年护理体系的服务提供和资金筹措方面都占据主导地位。然而,受新公共管理这一持续趋势的影响,过去15年的特点是政府鼓励竞争,结果私营服务提供者大幅增加。这项关于瑞典老年护理的案例研究为私有化的传播和发展背后的机制提供了新的见解。我们的结果表明,1990年老年护理部门劳动力中只有1%受雇于私人机构,相比之下,到2003年,私人机构所占比例已增至13%。随之而来的组织变革颇具争议,且常常受到批评。总体而言,左翼政治家经常捍卫由公共服务提供者主导的传统福利模式,而右翼政治家则敦促增加替代服务提供者的比例。在本研究中,利用1990年至2003年期间的统计数据来模拟私有化与一些经济、政治和社会/人口变量之间的关系。回归分析和扩散分析的结果表明,私人管理的老年护理主要在由右翼政权主导的大都市地区站稳了脚跟。令人惊讶的是,邻近的市政当局往往会追随这些先行者,而不论其政治倾向或经济状况如何。事实上,在政权更迭之后,许多由左翼政权主导的邻近市政当局不仅保留了大量私人承包商,还鼓励将公共管理的老年护理单位继续外包出去。结果,尽管存在政治和经济差异,但私有化程度不断提高的市政当局集群还是出现了。总之,在瑞典老年护理体系实施私有化改革时,除了人口密度、意识形态和财政状况外,地理 proximity似乎是一个重要变量。