• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组:对心理健康服务项目评估的启示

Focus group: implications for program evaluation of mental health services.

作者信息

Richter J M, Bottenberg D J, Roberto K A

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley 80639.

出版信息

J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):148-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02518609.

DOI:10.1007/BF02518609
PMID:10112337
Abstract

The focus group is a qualitative research method that involves group interaction based on a selected topic. It generally involves eight to 12 individuals who discuss a particular topic under the direction of a moderator who promotes interaction and guides the discussion on the topic of interest. This paper presents theoretical perspectives and a review of focus group methodology applied in related disciplines. A research project, which applied the focus group methodology, is described to illustrate important principles in utilizing this qualitative research technique. Information related to preparation for focus group sessions, structure, setting, participants, principles related to conducting the session and analysis are presented. The relevance of this methodology for research and practice in mental health also is discussed.

摘要

焦点小组是一种定性研究方法,它涉及基于选定主题的小组互动。通常有8至12人参与,他们在主持人的引导下讨论特定主题,主持人会促进互动并引导对感兴趣主题的讨论。本文介绍了相关学科中焦点小组方法的理论观点及综述。描述了一个应用焦点小组方法的研究项目,以说明运用这种定性研究技术的重要原则。文中还介绍了与焦点小组会议准备、结构、环境、参与者、会议开展及分析相关的原则。此外,还讨论了该方法在心理健康研究与实践中的相关性。

相似文献

1
Focus group: implications for program evaluation of mental health services.焦点小组:对心理健康服务项目评估的启示
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):148-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02518609.
2
The use of focus groups in health research.焦点小组在健康研究中的应用。
Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. 1988;1:81-90.
3
Focus groups, program evaluation and the mentally ill: a case study.
J Health Soc Policy. 1998;10(2):75-92. doi: 10.1300/J045v10n02_06.
4
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
5
Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。
Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.
6
Determining the effectiveness of mental health services from a consumer perspective: part 2: barriers to recovery and principles for evaluation.从消费者角度确定心理健康服务的有效性:第2部分:康复障碍与评估原则
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(2):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00520.x.
7
A methodology for including consumers' opinions in mental health evaluation research.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;45(1):76-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.1.76.
8
The appropriateness and use of focus group methodology across international mental health communities.焦点小组方法在国际心理健康社区中的适用性与应用情况。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Feb-May;16(1-2):24-30. doi: 10.1080/09540260310001635078.
9
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?让公众参与心理健康和学习障碍研究:我们能吗?我们应该吗?我们做到了吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Focus group interviews in health-care research.医疗保健研究中的焦点小组访谈。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Mar;14(6):395-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Alleviating cross-cultural challenges of Indian subcontinent students: University staff perspectives.缓解印度次大陆学生的跨文化挑战:大学工作人员的观点。
Tert Educ Manag (Dordr). 2022;28(2):171-185. doi: 10.1007/s11233-022-09094-8. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
Pediatric Diabetes Technology Management: An Italian Exploratory Study on Its Representations by Psychologists and Diabetologists.儿科糖尿病技术管理:意大利心理学家和糖尿病专家对其认知的探索性研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 May 21;13(5):919-931. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13050070.
3
Mapping the cultural characteristics of subcontinent students and the challenges to their academic success.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting focus group sessions.开展焦点小组会议。
Stud Fam Plann. 1981 Dec;12(12 Pt 1):443-9.
2
Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。
Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.
3
A focus group study on decision processes of young drivers: reasons that may support a decision to drink and drive.一项关于年轻驾驶者决策过程的焦点小组研究:可能支持酒后驾车决策的原因。
描绘次大陆学生的文化特征及他们在学业成功上面临的挑战。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0272159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272159. eCollection 2022.
4
Cluster-randomised trial evaluating a complex intervention to improve mental health and well-being of employees working in hospital - a protocol for the SEEGEN trial.评价一项旨在改善医院工作员工心理健康和福祉的复杂干预措施的整群随机试验——SEEGEN 试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1694. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7909-4.
5
Use of Legal Drugs by Psychiatric Outpatients: Benefits, Costs, and Change.精神科门诊患者使用合法药物:益处、成本与变化
Cogn Behav Pract. 1999;6(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/S1077-7229(99)80037-6.
6
Implementing psychosocial rehabilitation in long-term inpatient psychiatric facilities.在长期住院精神科机构中实施社会心理康复。
J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Winter;22(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/BF02519198.
Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):389-96. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600307.
4
Continuing professional education needs of clinical dietitians in Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州临床营养师的持续专业教育需求
J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Feb;90(2):282-6.