• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A summary measure of client level of functioning: progress and challenges for use within mental health agencies.

作者信息

Pokorny L J

机构信息

Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substances Abuse Services, Oklahoma City 73152.

出版信息

J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):80-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02518602.

DOI:10.1007/BF02518602
PMID:10112339
Abstract

A summary measure of clients' level of functioning could assist mental health agencies to better document and evaluate their services. Currently, numerous state mental health authorities collect a level of functioning measure within a management information system on virtually all clients served with state resources. The uses of these data include describing the clientele, defining a priority population for services, preparing performance indicators and measuring contract obligations. However, clearer delineation of the construct of functioning, further exploration of the psychometric properties of the instruments and stricter procedures to ensure the accuracy of data would result in data that are more useful for both management and research.

摘要

相似文献

1
A summary measure of client level of functioning: progress and challenges for use within mental health agencies.
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):80-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02518602.
2
Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: twelve years of the CCAR.
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):88-100. doi: 10.1007/BF02518603.
3
Client typology based on functioning level assessments: utility for service planning and monitoring.基于功能水平评估的客户类型学：对服务规划和监测的效用。
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):101-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02518604.
4
A systematic review of clinician-rated instruments to assess adults' levels of functioning in specialised public sector mental health services.一项关于临床医生评定工具的系统评价，以评估成年人在专门公共部门心理健康服务中的功能水平。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;51(4):338-354. doi: 10.1177/0004867416688098. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
5
Data and decisions: can mental health management be knowledge-based?
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Winter;18(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02521129.
6
The Client Interaction Scale. A method for assessing community support programs for persons with chronic mental illness.
Eval Health Prof. 1990 Jun;13(2):215-26. doi: 10.1177/016327879001300205.
7
Global function scales.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1994 Sep;29(5):205-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00796379.
8
Diagnostic Interview Schedule.诊断访谈表。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Dec;39(12):1442-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290120072014.
9
Patients' and relatives' satisfaction with psychiatric services: the state of the art of its measurement.患者及其亲属对精神科服务的满意度：测量方法的现状
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1994 Sep;29(5):212-27. doi: 10.1007/BF00796380.
10
The utility of level of functioning to characterize community residential settings.功能水平用于描述社区居住环境的效用。
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):116-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02518605.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Preschool and Early Childhood Functional Assessment Scale (PECFAS).学前和幼儿功能评估量表（PECFAS）的验证
J Child Fam Stud. 1999 Sep 1;8(3):343-356. doi: 10.1023/A:1022071430660.
2
The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS): review and current status.儿童与青少年功能评估量表（CAFAS）：综述与现状
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001 Mar;4(1):63-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1009528727345.
3
Measures of impairment for children and adolescents.
J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Fall;22(4):403-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02518634.

本文引用的文献

1
Accountability revisited: the arrival of client outcome evaluation.
Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(1):31-6.
2
Strengths, uses and problems of global scales as an evaluation instrument.
Eval Program Plann. 1980;3(4):257-68. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(80)90041-5.
3
Admission decisions and multiaxial diagnosis.入院决策与多轴诊断
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;41(10):1001-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790210083010.
4
DRGs in psychiatry. An empirical evaluation.
精神病学中的疾病诊断相关分组。一项实证评估。
Med Care. 1984 Jul;22(7):597-610. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198407000-00002.
5
Severity of illness and diagnostic formulation: classifying patients for prospective payment systems.疾病严重程度与诊断分类：为前瞻性支付系统对患者进行分类。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;36(7):770-2. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.7.770.
6
Planning a continuum of residential/service settings for the chronically mentally ill: the Colorado experience.为慢性精神病患者规划一系列住宿/服务场所：科罗拉多州的经验。
Community Ment Health J. 1986 Fall;22(3):190-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00756981.
7
The usefulness of DSM-III axis IV and axis V assessments.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jul;143(7):904-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.7.904.
8
The reliability of axis V of DSM-III.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版（DSM-III）中轴V的可靠性。
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;143(6):752-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.6.752.
9
The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.全球评估量表。一种测量精神障碍总体严重程度的程序。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Jun;33(6):766-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012.
10
DSM-III field trials: II. Initial experience with the multiaxial system.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版现场试验：二、多轴系统的初步经验
Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Jun;136(6):818-20. doi: 10.1176/ajp.136.6.818.