Pringle M
Nottingham University Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre.
Health Trends. 1991;23(1):15-8.
This article describes one method of professional performance review which relies heavily on confidentiality and comparability. For the Newark Information Sharing Project, an association of five practices collected data for two years on registrations, workload, prevention, referrals, prescribing, and disease prevalence. After central collation, the averages and ranges were returned to the individual practices with their position confidentially indicated. Unlike previous reports of inter-practice comparisons, this project involved no research funds or special assistance. The time and financial costs are quantified. This model is suitable for adoption by Medical Audit Advisory Groups.
本文介绍了一种专业绩效评估方法，该方法严重依赖保密性和可比性。在纽瓦克信息共享项目中，由五个医疗机构组成的协会对注册、工作量、预防、转诊、开处方和疾病患病率等数据进行了为期两年的收集。经过集中整理后，将平均值和范围反馈给各个医疗机构，并保密显示其排名。与以往医疗机构间比较的报告不同，该项目没有涉及研究资金或特殊援助。对时间和财务成本进行了量化。这种模式适合医疗审计咨询小组采用。
