• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

税收、监管与成瘾:基于时间序列证据的香烟需求函数

Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence.

作者信息

Keeler T E, Hu T W, Barnett P G, Manning W G

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1993 Apr;12(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90037-f.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(93)90037-f
PMID:10126486
Abstract

This work analyzes the effects of prices, taxes, income, and anti-smoking regulations on the consumption of cigarettes in California (a 25-cent-per-pack state tax increase in 1989 enhances the usefulness of this exercise). Analysis is based on monthly time-series data for 1980 through 1990. Results show a price elasticity of demand for cigarettes in the short run of -0.3 to -0.5 at mean data values, and -0.5 to -0.6 in the long run. We find at least some support for two further hypotheses: that antismoking regulations reduce cigarette consumption, and that consumers behave consistently with the model of rational addiction.

摘要

本研究分析了价格、税收、收入及禁烟法规对加利福尼亚州香烟消费的影响(1989年每包香烟加征25美分的州税增强了此项研究的效用)。分析基于1980年至1990年的月度时间序列数据。结果显示,在平均数据值水平上,香烟需求的短期价格弹性为-0.3至-0.5,长期价格弹性为-0.5至-0.6。我们至少为另外两个假设找到了一些支持证据:禁烟法规减少了香烟消费,以及消费者的行为符合理性成瘾模型。

相似文献

1
Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence.税收、监管与成瘾:基于时间序列证据的香烟需求函数
J Health Econ. 1993 Apr;12(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90037-f.
2
A major state tobacco tax increase, the master settlement agreement, and cigarette consumption: the California experience.一项重大的州烟草税上调、《主和解协议》与卷烟消费:加利福尼亚州的经验
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):1030-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042697.
3
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
4
[Tobacco taxes, prices and demand for tobacco products: a comparative analysis].[烟草税、价格与烟草制品需求:比较分析]
Gac Sanit. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):425-35. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(02)71952-3.
5
Do cigarette producers price-discriminate by state? An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation.香烟生产商是否按州进行价格歧视?对当地香烟定价和税收的实证分析。
J Health Econ. 1996 Aug;15(4):499-512. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00498-5.
6
[Effects of tobacco tax increase on cigarette consumption and the impact on health policy].[提高烟草税对卷烟消费的影响及对健康政策的冲击]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Jul;49(7):660-4. doi: 10.1007/s00103-006-1286-8.
7
The synergistic effect of cigarette taxes on the consumption of cigarettes, alcohol and betel nuts.香烟税对香烟、酒精和槟榔消费的协同效应。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 25;7:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-121.
8
The effect of Taiwan's tax-induced increases in cigarette prices on brand-switching and the consumption of cigarettes.台湾税收导致香烟价格上涨对品牌转换及香烟消费的影响。
Health Econ. 2005 Jun;14(6):627-41. doi: 10.1002/hec.972.
9
The effect of cigarette price increase on the cigarette consumption in Taiwan: evidence from the National Health Interview Surveys on cigarette consumption.香烟价格上涨对台湾地区香烟消费的影响:基于全国香烟消费健康访谈调查的证据
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 14;4:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-61.
10
The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption.加利福尼亚州第99号提案(一项主要的反吸烟法)对香烟消费的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 1994 Spring;15(1):26-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Substitution and Complementarity in the Consumption of Alcohol, Cannabis, and Opium.酒精、大麻和鸦片消费中的替代与互补关系。
Health Econ. 2025 May;34(5):827-854. doi: 10.1002/hec.4938. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
Effects of experimental income on demand for potentially real cigarettes.实验性收入对潜在真香烟需求的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Mar;17(3):292-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu139. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
3
Does every US smoker bear the same cigarette tax?每个美国吸烟者承担的香烟税都一样吗?
Addiction. 2014 Oct;109(10):1741-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12630. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Increased cigarette tax is associated with reductions in alcohol consumption in a longitudinal U.S. sample.在美国的一个纵向样本中,增加香烟税与降低酒精消费有关。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jan;38(1):241-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12226. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
5
The impacts of recent smoking control policies on individual smoking choice: the case of Japan.最近控烟政策对个人吸烟选择的影响:以日本为例。
Health Econ Rev. 2013 Mar 8;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-4.
6
The effect of the California tobacco control program on smoking prevalence, cigarette consumption, and healthcare costs: 1989-2008.加州控烟计划对吸烟率、香烟消费和医疗成本的影响:1989-2008 年。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e47145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047145. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟起始、戒烟和流行率的影响:系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: a targeted review.关于食品价格变化与食品购买模式关系的实验研究:有针对性的综述。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Apr;95(4):789-809. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024380. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
9
Price and cigarette consumption in Europe.欧洲的烟草价格与消费量
Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):114-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012468.
10
Economic gains and health benefits from a new cigarette tax scheme in Taiwan: a simulation using the CGE model.台湾一项新香烟税方案带来的经济收益与健康效益:基于可计算一般均衡模型的模拟分析
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 10;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-62.