Davidson G, Gillies P
University Hospital and Medical School, University of Nottingham.
Qual Health Care. 1993 Mar;2(1):21-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.1.21.
OBJECTIVES--To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of risk of occupational HIV transmission in hospital in relation to existing guidelines. DESIGN--Cross sectional anonymous questionnaire survey of all occupational groups. SETTING--One large inner city teaching hospital. SUBJECTS--All 1530 staff working in the hospital in October 1991 and 22 managers. MAIN MEASURES--Knowledge of safe working practices and hospital guidelines; attitudes towards patients with AIDS; perception of risk of occupational transmission of HIV; availability of guidelines. RESULTS--The response rate in the questionnaire survey was 63% (958/1530). Although staff across all occupational groups knew of the potential risk of infection from needlestick injury (98%, 904/922), significantly more non-clinical staff (ambulance, catering, and domestic staff) than clinical staff (doctors, nurses, and paramedics) thought HIV could be transmitted by giving blood (38%, 153/404 v 12%, 40/346; chi 2 = 66.1 p < 0.001); one in ten clinical staff believed this. Except for midwives, half of staff in most occupational groups and 19% (17/91) of doctors and 22% (28/125) of nurses thought gloves should be worn in all contacts with people with AIDS. Most staff (62%, 593/958), including 38% (36/94) of doctors and 52% (67/128) of nurses thought patients should be routinely tested on admission, 17% of doctors and 19% of nurses thought they should be isolated in hospital. One in three staff perceived themselves at risk of HIV. Midwives, nurses, and theatre technicians were most aware of guidelines for safe working compared with only half of doctors, ambulance, and paramedical staff and no incinerator staff. CONCLUSIONS--Policy guidelines for safe working practices for patients with HIV infection and AIDS need to be disseminated across all occupational groups to reduce negative staff attitudes, improve knowledge of occupational transmission, establish an appropriate perception of risk, and create a supportive and caring hospital environment for people with HIV. IMPLICATIONS--Managers need to disseminate policy guidelines and information to all staff on an ongoing basis.
目的——根据现有指南评估医院工作人员对职业性艾滋病毒传播风险的知识、态度和认知。设计——对所有职业群体进行横断面匿名问卷调查。地点——一家大型市中心教学医院。对象——1991年10月在该医院工作的所有1530名工作人员和22名管理人员。主要测量指标——安全工作规范和医院指南的知识;对艾滋病患者的态度;对职业性艾滋病毒传播风险的认知;指南的可得性。结果——问卷调查的回复率为63%(958/1530)。尽管所有职业群体的工作人员都知道针刺伤有感染的潜在风险(98%,904/922),但认为艾滋病毒可通过献血传播的非临床工作人员(救护车司机、餐饮和勤杂人员)显著多于临床工作人员(医生、护士和护理人员)(38%,153/404对12%,40/346;χ²= 66.1,p<0.001);十分之一的临床工作人员也这样认为。除助产士外,大多数职业群体中一半的工作人员以及19%(17/91)的医生和22%(28/125)的护士认为在与艾滋病患者的所有接触中都应戴手套。大多数工作人员(62%,593/958),包括38%(36/94)的医生和52%(67/128)的护士认为患者入院时应常规进行检测,17%的医生和19%的护士认为他们应在医院隔离。三分之一的工作人员认为自己有感染艾滋病毒的风险。与只有一半的医生、救护车司机和护理人员以及没有焚化炉工作人员相比,助产士、护士和手术室技术人员对安全工作指南最为了解。结论——需要向所有职业群体传播针对艾滋病毒感染患者和艾滋病患者的安全工作规范政策指南,以减少工作人员的负面态度,提高对职业传播的认识,建立适当的风险认知,并为艾滋病毒感染者营造一个支持性和关爱的医院环境。启示——管理人员需要持续向所有工作人员传播政策指南和信息。