• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旋翼机院前急救中RTS(修订创伤评分)与RAPS(快速急性生理学评分)的相关性

Correlation of the RTS (Revised Trauma Score) and RAPS (Rapid Acute Physiology Score) in rotor-wing prehospital care.

作者信息

Bertollo S, Rodenberg H

机构信息

University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.

出版信息

Air Med J. 1994 Mar;13(3):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(05)80299-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1067-991x(05)80299-8
PMID:10132620
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) has been applied to patients transported by air, but not correlated with commonly used prehospital indices. The authors desired to determine the correlation between RAPS and Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Correlations between RAPS and RTS in patients with non-trauma ills were also investigated.

METHODS

Eight-hundred forty-four consecutive patients transported by helicopter were retrospectively evaluated. Demographics, origin of transport, nature of illness, RTS and RAPS were recorded. RTS vs. RAPS scores were graphed using sunflower technique and correlation was calculated using Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficients (SCC). Alpha was set at < or = .05.

RESULTS

Sunflower plots revealed wide ranges of RAPS at like RTS values in less severely ill or injured patients. SCC analysis revealed statistically significant (p < .05) correlations for all patients and for subgroups of prehospital trauma, prehospital medical, interfacility trauma and interfacility medical patients. Degrees of correlation varied between groups, with agreement being strongest in prehospital trauma and weakest in interfacility trauma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that RTS and RAPS scores exhibit significant correlation in a variety of patient populations. The wide range of RAPS seen at like RTS values suggests that RAPS may be a more sensitive indicator of physiologic status in patients transported by air.

摘要

引言

快速急性生理学评分(RAPS)已应用于空中转运的患者,但与常用的院前指标无相关性。作者希望确定RAPS与修订创伤评分(RTS)之间的相关性。还研究了非创伤性疾病患者中RAPS与RTS之间的相关性。

方法

对844例连续由直升机转运的患者进行回顾性评估。记录人口统计学资料、转运起点、疾病性质、RTS和RAPS。使用向日葵技术绘制RTS与RAPS评分的图表,并使用Spearman等级相关系数(SCC)计算相关性。α设定为≤0.05。

结果

向日葵图显示,病情较轻或受伤较轻的患者在相同RTS值时RAPS范围较广。SCC分析显示,所有患者以及院前创伤、院前医疗、机构间创伤和机构间医疗患者亚组均存在统计学显著相关性(p<0.05)。不同组之间的相关程度不同,院前创伤患者的一致性最强,机构间创伤患者的一致性最弱。

结论

我们得出结论,RTS和RAPS评分在各种患者群体中均表现出显著相关性。在相同RTS值时观察到的RAPS范围较广表明,RAPS可能是空中转运患者生理状态更敏感的指标。

相似文献

1
Correlation of the RTS (Revised Trauma Score) and RAPS (Rapid Acute Physiology Score) in rotor-wing prehospital care.旋翼机院前急救中RTS(修订创伤评分)与RAPS(快速急性生理学评分)的相关性
Air Med J. 1994 Mar;13(3):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(05)80299-8.
2
Prediction of the intensity of patient care in prehospital helicopter transport: use of the revised trauma score.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Jan;66(1):11-4.
3
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.直升机直接转运与地面转运对创伤患者院内死亡率的影响:倾向评分分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01207.x.
5
EMS and emergency department physician triage: injury severity in trauma patients transported by helicopter.紧急医疗服务(EMS)与急诊科医生的分诊:直升机转运创伤患者的损伤严重程度
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):198-202. doi: 10.1080/10903120590924681.
6
The Rapid Acute Physiology Score.快速急性生理学评分
Am J Emerg Med. 1987 Jul;5(4):278-82. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90350-0.
7
[Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation].[儿科院前创伤护理。空中与地面转运的回顾性比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1000-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0520-6.
8
Helicopter interfacility transport of pediatric trauma patients: Are we overusing a costly resource?儿科创伤患者的直升机机构间转运:我们是否在过度使用一种昂贵的资源?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):313-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000904.
9
Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.
10
Effect of aeromedical aircraft on care of trauma patients: evaluation using the Revised Trauma Score.
South Med J. 1992 Nov;85(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199211000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
The Value of Physiological Scoring Criteria in Predicting the In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Patients; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生理评分标准在预测急性患者院内死亡率中的价值;一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 9;9(1):e60. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1274. eCollection 2021.
2
Risk assessment in the first fifteen minutes: a prospective cohort study of a simple physiological scoring system in the emergency department.十五分钟内的风险评估:急诊部简单生理评分系统的前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R25. doi: 10.1186/cc9972. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
3
Bench-to-bedside review: outcome predictions for critically ill patients in the emergency department.
从实验室到临床的综述:急诊科危重症患者的预后预测
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):376-83. doi: 10.1186/cc3518. Epub 2005 Apr 18.