• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effect of aeromedical aircraft on care of trauma patients: evaluation using the Revised Trauma Score.

作者信息

Rodenberg H

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610.

出版信息

South Med J. 1992 Nov;85(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199211000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00007611-199211000-00004
PMID:1439941
Abstract

Rotor wing aircraft used in transport of the trauma victim have not been subject to objective means of evaluating their contribution to patient care. A retrospective evaluation of a Bell 206 L-1 and an Aerospatiale 365 N-1 using the Revised Trauma Score Triage (RTS) as an indicator of status in 98 patients transported from the scene of injury was conducted. Ground (GT), flight (FT), and total mission (TMT) times, as well as initial RTS, final RTS, and the difference between them (DRTS) were determined for all patients. Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA. GT, FT, and TMT were significantly lower in patients transported by the 365 N-1. In more severely injured patients (RTS < or = 10), DRTS and final RTS were significantly higher in the 365 N-1; FT was significantly less. The contributions of various aeromedical aircraft to the care of the trauma victim may be assessed using objective indices of patient status.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effect of aeromedical aircraft on care of trauma patients: evaluation using the Revised Trauma Score.
South Med J. 1992 Nov;85(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199211000-00004.
2
The revised trauma score: a means to evaluate aeromedical staffing patterns.修订后的创伤评分:一种评估空中医疗人员配置模式的方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992 Apr;63(4):308-13.
3
Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: medical and logistical considerations.创伤患者的地面与空中转运:医学及后勤方面的考量
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Dec;15(12):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80950-7.
4
Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.直升机直接转运与地面转运对创伤患者院内死亡率的影响:倾向评分分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01207.x.
5
Decreased mortality after prehospital interventions in severely injured trauma patients.严重创伤患者院前干预后死亡率降低。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Aug;79(2):227-31. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000748.
6
Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.
7
Mortality following helicopter versus ground transport of injured children.受伤儿童直升机转运与地面转运后的死亡率。
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Does Mode of Transport Confer a Mortality Benefit in Trauma Patients? Characteristics and Outcomes at an Ontario Lead Trauma Hospital.交通方式对创伤患者的死亡率有影响吗?安大略省一家主要创伤医院的特征与结果
CJEM. 2016 Sep;18(5):363-9. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.15. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Revised trauma score: a triage tool in the accident and emergency department.
Injury. 1991 Jan;22(1):35-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90158-b.
10
Southeast Alaska to Seattle emergency medical air transports: demographics, stabilization, and outcomes.阿拉斯加东南部至西雅图的紧急医疗空中运输:人口统计学、病情稳定情况及结果
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Aug;19(8):914-21. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81570-7.