Bamford C, Jacoby A
Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):153-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.153.
To develop a method for conducting postal surveys of patients' views and experiences of general practitioner care and to produce an off the shelf tool for general practice audit.
Prospective study of performance of two patient questionnaires assessing accessibility to services (questionnaire 1) and interpersonal aspects of care (questionnaire 2) in comparing general practices.
Five general practices in Newcastle upon Tyne.
3800 patients aged 16 and over, 1900 randomly drawn from family health services authority lists for each practice (questionnaire 1) and 1900 drawn from practice records (questionnaire 2).
Response rates and technical evaluation of performance of the questionnaires (reliability, item nonresponse, ineligible response, sensitivity, and validity).
Response rate for questionnaire 1 was 77% (range 69% to 83%) and to questionnaire 2, 82% (77% to 86%). Analysis of respondents and nonrespondents showed that significantly more women, people aged 65 or more, and those consulting in the past six months returned the questionnaires. Technical evaluation indicated good face validity and content validity and good internal consistency.
A standardised off the shelf tool for audit was developed, and it will be a valuable model for future audits in general practice.
开发一种对患者关于全科医生诊疗的观点和体验进行邮寄调查的方法,并制作一种现成的用于全科医疗审核的工具。
对两份患者问卷在比较不同全科医疗时评估服务可及性(问卷1)和诊疗人际方面(问卷2)表现的前瞻性研究。
泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔的五家全科医疗诊所。
3800名16岁及以上患者,每家诊所从家庭健康服务机构名单中随机抽取1900名(问卷1),从诊所记录中抽取1900名(问卷2)。
问卷的回复率和表现的技术评估(信度、项目无应答、不合格应答、敏感性和效度)。
问卷1的回复率为77%(范围69%至83%),问卷2为82%(77%至86%)。对应答者和无应答者的分析表明,女性、65岁及以上人群以及过去六个月内就诊的人群返回问卷的比例显著更高。技术评估显示出良好的表面效度和内容效度以及良好的内部一致性。
开发出了一种现成的标准化审核工具,它将成为未来全科医疗审核的宝贵模式。