• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幸福安康:健康服务的哲学基础。

Well-being: a philosophical basis for health services.

作者信息

Moore A

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 1994 Aug;2(3):207-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02251021.

DOI:10.1007/BF02251021
PMID:10137627
Abstract

This paper develops and defends the claim that the promotion of human well-being is a philosophical basis or rationale for health services. It first sketches a case for this thesis, then defends it against various objections arising from the contrary position, here dubbed The Sceptical View. Later sections of the paper elaborate on the meaning of 'well-being', the nature of well-being, and the scope of appropriate health service concern with well-being. In particular, distinctions are made between 'thick' and 'thin' well-being, and between well-being and its various measures. These discussions generate further defences of the philosophical centrality of human well-being to health services.

摘要

本文提出并捍卫了这样一种观点

促进人类福祉是卫生服务的哲学基础或基本原理。它首先简述了支持这一论点的理由,然后针对来自相反立场(这里称为怀疑论观点)的各种反对意见进行辩护。本文后面的部分详细阐述了“福祉”的含义、福祉的本质,以及卫生服务对福祉的适当关注范围。特别是,区分了“丰富”和“单薄”的福祉,以及福祉与其各种衡量标准。这些讨论进一步捍卫了人类福祉在卫生服务中的哲学核心地位。

相似文献

1
Well-being: a philosophical basis for health services.幸福安康:健康服务的哲学基础。
Health Care Anal. 1994 Aug;2(3):207-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02251021.
2
Anchor and course for the modern ship of casuistry.为决疑论这艘现代之船锚定方向并规划航线。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Summer;3(3):391-402. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005223.
3
Defining the medical sphere.界定医学领域。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997 Fall;6(4):416-34. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000815x.
4
Critical care ethics in Asia: global or local?亚洲的重症监护伦理:全球的还是本土的?
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):549-62. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.547.2562.
5
Efficiency, autonomy, and communal values in health care.医疗保健中的效率、自主性和集体价值观。
Yale Law Policy Rev. 1992;10(2):316-61.
6
Complementary and alternative medicine: the challenges of ethical justification. A philosophical analysis and evaluation of ethical reasons for the offer, use and promotion of complementary and alternative medicine.补充与替代医学:伦理辩护的挑战。对提供、使用和推广补充与替代医学的伦理理由进行哲学分析与评估。
Med Health Care Philos. 2007 Sep;10(3):329-45. doi: 10.1007/s11019-007-9050-x. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
7
Ensuring care, respect, and fairness for the elderly.确保对老年人的关怀、尊重和公平对待。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Oct;14(5):27-31.
8
Of community, organs and obligations: routine salvage with a twist.社区、器官与义务:别具一格的常规挽救措施。
Theor Med. 1996 Mar;17(1):61-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00489741.
9
The foundations of bioethics: the attempt to legitimate biomedical decisions and health care policy.生物伦理学的基础:使生物医学决策和医疗保健政策合法化的尝试。
Rev Metaphys Morale. 1987 Jul-Dec;92(3):387-99.
10
Our world views (may be) incommensurable: now what?我们的世界观可能不可通约:那又如何?
J Med Philos. 1995 Jun;20(3):271-84. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.3.271.

引用本文的文献

1
Biodiversity and human well-being: an essential link for sustainable development.生物多样性与人类福祉:可持续发展的关键纽带。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 14;283(1844). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2091.

本文引用的文献

1
The purpose-process gap in health promotion [corrected].健康促进中的目标-过程差距[已修正]
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):31-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02251333.