Silagy C, Lancaster T, Gray S, Fowler G
Flinders University of South Australia School of Medicine, Adelaide.
Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;3(4):193-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.4.193.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions that train healthcare professionals in methods for improving the quality of care delivered to patients who smoke.
Systematic literature review.
Primary care medical and dental practices in the United States and Canada. Patients were recruited opportunistically.
878 healthcare professionals and 11,228 patients who smoked and were identified in eight randomised controlled trials. In each of these trials healthcare professionals received formal training in smoking cessation, and their performance was compared with that of a control group.
Point prevalence rates of abstinence from smoking at six or 12 months in patients who were smokers at baseline. Rates of performance of tasks of smoking cessation by healthcare professionals, including offering counselling, setting dates to stop smoking, giving follow up appointments, distributing self help materials, and recommending nicotine gum.
Trials were identified by multiple methods. Data were abstracted according to predetermined criteria by two observers. When possible, meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model and the results were subjected to sensitivity analysis.
Healthcare professionals who had received training were significantly more likely to perform tasks of smoking cessation than untrained controls. There was a modest increase in the odds of stopping smoking for smokers attending health professionals who had received training compared with patients attending control practitioners (odds ratio 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.68)). This result was not robust to sensitivity analysis. The effects of training were increased if prompts and reminders were used. There was no definite benefit found for more intensive forms of counselling compared with minimal contact strategies.
Training health professionals to provide smoking cessation interventions had a measurable impact on professional performance. A modest, but non-robust, effect on patient outcome was also found, suggesting that training alone is unlikely to be an effective strategy for improving quality of care, unless organisational and other factors are also considered.
评估培训医疗保健专业人员采用提高对吸烟患者护理质量方法的干预措施的有效性。
系统文献综述。
美国和加拿大的初级医疗和牙科诊所。患者为机会性招募。
878名医疗保健专业人员以及在8项随机对照试验中识别出的11228名吸烟患者。在每项试验中,医疗保健专业人员接受了戒烟方面的正规培训,并将其表现与对照组进行比较。
基线时为吸烟者的患者在6个月或12个月时的戒烟点患病率。医疗保健专业人员开展戒烟任务的比例,包括提供咨询、设定戒烟日期、安排随访预约、分发自助材料以及推荐尼古丁口香糖。
通过多种方法识别试验。由两名观察者根据预定标准提取数据。尽可能使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析,并对结果进行敏感性分析。
接受过培训的医疗保健专业人员比未受过培训的对照组更有可能开展戒烟任务。与就诊于对照从业者的患者相比,就诊于接受过培训的医疗保健专业人员的吸烟者戒烟几率适度增加(优势比1.35(95%置信区间1.09至1.68))。该结果对敏感性分析不稳健。如果使用提示和提醒,培训效果会增强。与最低限度接触策略相比,未发现更强化形式的咨询有明确益处。
培训卫生专业人员提供戒烟干预措施对专业表现有可测量的影响。还发现对患者结局有适度但不稳健的影响,这表明仅靠培训不太可能是提高护理质量的有效策略,除非同时考虑组织和其他因素。